Best 10 Bitcoin Apps - Last Updated October 25, 2020

I got tired of using a spreadsheet for calculating DCA, so i made an android app

I'm a hodler, and i made this for my own personal use, but half way through i realized it could be useful to others that do DCA, and with just a little more work i could make it store worthy, so i went ahead and did it. It's free, with no limits on time or the number of things it can store, but i did add some extra features for purchase so i could maybe make a few bucks from it. More about that in a minute.
Here's a play store link: DC Averagizer Sorry no iphone or windows version right now.
It's not that i hate using excel or anything, it's just that my DCA buys have become less exciting and more of a standard procedure when i see a dip. I don't spend all day looking at charts anymore, and i don't need to over complicate things. I just wanted the quick convenience of a dedicated app.
I did look for other apps in the store, are there are a bunch, but none of the ones i tried were very suited to crypto. They were cluttered with other investing features, and only showed 2 decimal places, among other issues. So i figured the only way to get exactly what i want is to make it myself.
So this app does one thing and one thing only, it calculates my DCA and stores the info for all my crypto buys and sells. And it always shows all values to the eighth decimal place. I made two sections. One for doing quick calculations with just the price and quantity. And another "portfolio" section that stores all the relevant info, like coin name, ticker, currency, buy/sell dates, and a note section in case i want to enter what exchange it's on or what wallet it's stored in.
I know most of the free world loves dark themes, so i made the default theme be dark. But i'm no artist, so if you think it looks god awful, i added other theme options as a "pro unlock". I made bitcoin and ethereum themes using some of their official colors, and i also made a theme customizer so you can make it look however you want. And the pro unlock also includes backup and restore, because i don't want to loose all the data if i get a new phone or have to reset my phone.
As far as security, there really isn't much to worry about, because it's not meant to store passwords, private keys, credit card numbers, or anything else like that. But just to be perfectly clear, DON'T STORE YOUR PRIVATE KEYS IN THE NOTES. Always be safe and smart with your keys, passwords, etc. There's no reason to store that stuff in an app like this, it's just a calculator.
And while i've got your attention, i just want to say that you should never store private keys or seed words digitally, and never take a picture of them. Especially if you use a ledgetrezor. The point of a hardware wallet is that the keys are never exposed to your computer and it's viruses, the keys only exist on the internal circuitry of the device and on paper as a backup. Typing those words into a computephone defeats the whole purpose of using a hardware wallet in the first place. (i'm very security conscious, so feel free to chat me up about that if you want. i won't consider it thread hijacking or anything)
Okay back to the app. If you use the backup feature, then obviously it will need storage permission, but you can revoke that permission right after you save your backup and it will not affect the app in any other way. And it will only ask for that permission if you actually try to use backup/restore.
Again, i started this project for my own personal use, and it does everything i need it to do, but if any of you decide to check it out and find an important feature missing, just let me know and i'll consider updating it. And of course if you find any bugs, i'll try to fix them asap.
submitted by blevok to Bitcoin [link] [comments]

I got tired of using a spreadsheet for calculating DCA, so i made an android app

I'm a hodler, and i made this for my own personal use, but half way through i realized it could be useful to others that do DCA, and with just a little more work i could make it store worthy, so i went ahead and did it. It's free, with no limits on time or the number of things it can store, but i did add some extra features for purchase so i could maybe make a few bucks from it. More about that in a minute.
Here's a play store link: DC Averagizer Sorry no iphone or windows version right now.
It's not that i hate using excel or anything, it's just that my DCA buys have become less exciting and more of a standard procedure when i see a dip. I don't spend all day looking at charts anymore, and i don't need to over complicate things. I just wanted the quick convenience of a dedicated app.
I did look for other apps in the store, are there are a bunch, but none of the ones i tried were very suited to crypto. They were cluttered with other investing features, and only showed 2 decimal places, among other issues. So i figured the only way to get exactly what i want is to make it myself.
So this app does one thing and one thing only, it calculates my DCA and stores the info for all my crypto buys and sells. And it always shows all values to the eighth decimal place. I made two sections. One for doing quick calculations with just the price and quantity. And another "portfolio" section that stores all the relevant info, like coin name, ticker, currency, buy/sell dates, and a note section in case i want to enter what exchange it's on or what wallet it's stored in.
I know most of the free world loves dark themes, so i made the default theme be dark. But i'm no artist, so if you think it looks god awful, i added other theme options as a "pro unlock". I made bitcoin and ethereum themes using some of their official colors, and i also made a theme customizer so you can make it look however you want. And the pro unlock also includes backup and restore, because i don't want to loose all the data if i get a new phone or have to reset my phone.
As far as security, there really isn't much to worry about, because it's not meant to store passwords, private keys, credit card numbers, or anything else like that. But just to be perfectly clear, DON'T STORE YOUR PRIVATE KEYS IN THE NOTES. Always be safe and smart with your keys, passwords, etc. There's no reason to store that stuff in an app like this, it's just a calculator.
And while i've got your attention, i just want to say that you should never store private keys or seed words digitally, and never take a picture of them. Especially if you use a ledgetrezor. The point of a hardware wallet is that the keys are never exposed to your computer and it's viruses, the keys only exist on the internal circuitry of the device and on paper as a backup. Typing those words into a computephone defeats the whole purpose of using a hardware wallet in the first place. (i'm very security conscious, so feel free to chat me up about that if you want. i won't consider it thread hijacking or anything)
Okay back to the app. If you use the backup feature, then obviously it will need storage permission, but you can revoke that permission right after you save your backup and it will not affect the app in any other way. And it will only ask for that permission if you actually try to use backup/restore.
Again, i started this project for my own personal use, and it does everything i need it to do, but if any of you decide to check it out and find an important feature missing, just let me know and i'll consider updating it. And of course if you find any bugs, i'll try to fix them asap.
submitted by blevok to CryptoCurrency [link] [comments]

I got tired of using a spreadsheet for calculating DCA, so i made an android app

I'm a hodler, and i made this for my own personal use, but half way through i realized it could be useful to others that do DCA, and with just a little more work i could make it store worthy, so i went ahead and did it. It's free, with no limits on time or the number of things it can store, but i did add some extra features for purchase so i could maybe make a few bucks from it. More about that in a minute.
Here's a play store link: DC Averagizer Sorry no iphone or windows version right now.
It's not that i hate using excel or anything, it's just that my DCA buys have become less exciting and more of a standard procedure when i see a dip. I don't spend all day looking at charts anymore, and i don't need to over complicate things. I just wanted the quick convenience of a dedicated app.
I did look for other apps in the store, are there are a bunch, but none of the ones i tried were very suited to crypto. They were cluttered with other investing features, and only showed 2 decimal places, among other issues. So i figured the only way to get exactly what i want is to make it myself.
So this app does one thing and one thing only, it calculates my DCA and stores the info for all my crypto buys and sells. And it always shows all values to the eighth decimal place. I made two sections. One for doing quick calculations with just the price and quantity. And another "portfolio" section that stores all the relevant info, like coin name, ticker, currency, buy/sell dates, and a note section in case i want to enter what exchange it's on or what wallet it's stored in.
I know most of the free world loves dark themes, so i made the default theme be dark. But i'm no artist, so if you think it looks god awful, i added other theme options as a "pro unlock". I made bitcoin and ethereum themes using some of their official colors, and i also made a theme customizer so you can make it look however you want. And the pro unlock also includes backup and restore, because i don't want to loose all the data if i get a new phone or have to reset my phone.
As far as security, there really isn't much to worry about, because it's not meant to store passwords, private keys, credit card numbers, or anything else like that. But just to be perfectly clear, DON'T STORE YOUR PRIVATE KEYS IN THE NOTES. Always be safe and smart with your keys, passwords, etc. There's no reason to store that stuff in an app like this, it's just a calculator.
And while i've got your attention, i just want to say that you should never store private keys or seed words digitally, and never take a picture of them. Especially if you use a ledgetrezor. The point of a hardware wallet is that the keys are never exposed to your computer and it's viruses, the keys only exist on the internal circuitry of the device and on paper as a backup. Typing those words into a computephone defeats the whole purpose of using a hardware wallet in the first place. (i'm very security conscious, so feel free to chat me up about that if you want. i won't consider it thread hijacking or anything)
Okay back to the app. If you use the backup feature, then obviously it will need storage permission, but you can revoke that permission right after you save your backup and it will not affect the app in any other way. And it will only ask for that permission if you actually try to use backup/restore.
Again, i started this project for my own personal use, and it does everything i need it to do, but if any of you decide to check it out and find an important feature missing, just let me know and i'll consider updating it. And of course if you find any bugs, i'll try to fix them asap.
submitted by blevok to ethtrader [link] [comments]

Suggestions for a free technical indicator notification app for iOS? Including RSI?

Hi folks. I've been searching around for a free app for my Iphone that will send me push notifications when a coin I am tracking hits a certain predetermined area of a technical indicator. For example, if BNB/BTC rises above 70 RSI on the 5-minute chart, I'm looking for an app that will send me a push notification immediately. Does anyone happen to know of an app that offers this functionality?
I tried setting this up on another app I saw recommended here called "BitcoinCrazYness" that claims to have such functionality, but I never received any alerts on my phone when it was supposed to (and I do have push notifications enabled).
Thanks in advance for any suggestions! If there is absolutely nothing free available, I am willing to consider paid alternatives.
submitted by dinofragrance to BitcoinMarkets [link] [comments]

I've been working on a python program that forecasts bitcoin/alt coin prices based on back historical data. Crypto currencies are extremely volatile but that doesn't mean there aren't seasonal and predictive patterns. Is there any interest for a site displays forecasted models/graphs?

Right now I am running the program on an AWS EC2 server and texting (MMS) the images to myself (graphs forecasted 1day/3day/1week/3week etc.) for different currencies.
It would be pretty simple to add new users who want a once per day text showing them the highest predicted alt currencies for the day and also the predicted Bitcoin charts for the coming weeks.
Basically I've spent a lot of time creating predictive models and have good resources for up-to-date data, just need to know what people like you would want to see in a website or service that would show you this information. I can create iPhone Apps/websites but want to find out what you find most useful before I go to far down a rabbit hole.
Edit: Thanks for all the feedback. Just getting home from work and will go through the comments and try to respond.
Edit #2: People were asking for backtested data. Here is what the prediction model forecasted for data up to 1/14/18. The forecasts are at 1 week intervals predicting data up to 2/11/18. Prediction graphs. Looks like it was predicting a drop to 7.7k by 2-4 and a jump to ~12k today. The numbers aren't accurate in that they aren't the exact price, but in general the market trends are spot on.
Edit #3: put up a temporary email signup for people who want to be on the first couple rounds of daily email digests. If a lot of people show interest I will try to push the site a long faster.
http://amytoldme.com/charts
Edit #4 (3/6/18): I created a beta website with some minimal charts. They're updated 24/7. amytoldme.com
submitted by makhalifa to CryptoMarkets [link] [comments]

I've been working on a python program that forecasts bitcoin/alt coin prices based on historical trends. Crypto currencies are extremely volatile but that doesn't mean there aren't seasonal and predictive patterns. Is there any interest for a site displays forecasted models/graphs?

Right now I am running the program on an AWS EC2 server and texting (MMS) the images to myself (graphs forecasted 1day/3day/1week/3week etc.) for different currencies.
It would be pretty simple to add new users who want a once per day text showing them the highest predicted alt currencies for the day and also the predicted Bitcoin charts for the coming weeks.
Basically I've spent a lot of time creating predictive models and have good resources for up-to-date data, just need to know what people like you would want to see in a website or service that would show you this information. I can create iPhone Apps/websites but want to find out what you find most useful before I go to far down a rabbit hole.
Here is an example (price spoiler alert) of a predictive BTC chart that I ran today.
Chart.
Edit: Thanks for all the feedback. Just getting home from work and will go through the comments and try to respond.
Edit #2: People were asking for backtested data. Here is what the prediction model forecasted for data up to 1/14/18. The forecasts are at 1 week intervals predicting data up to 2/11/18. Prediction
graphs.
Looks like it was predicting a drop to 7.7k by 2-4 and a jump to ~12k today. The numbers aren't accurate in that they aren't the exact price, but in general the trends are the market are spot on.
Edit #3: put up a temporary email signup for people who want to be on the first couple rounds of daily email digests. If a lot of people show interest I will try to push the site a long faster.
http://amytoldme.com/charts
Edit #4 (3/6/18): Here's the beta website, charts updated 24/7. More to come! amytoldme.com
submitted by makhalifa to Bitcoin [link] [comments]

NEX AMA Answers!

Some of the NEX team went through the questions asked a couple of days ago, but due to the answers being posted sporadically, i thought it might be better collating answers and reposting for visibility!
I highly recommend reading through if you are interested in NEX!
    NEX team marked as
U = u/Unignorant, C = u/Canesin, L = u/Localalhost_coz  
Original post here
Q: What is the NEX marketing plan to grow in terms of a customer base ? And how far is the team away from a finished product? During most of the interviews I noticed the team reference comparison to Binance, how does the interface match binance in a decentralized environment? (u/sheldonbraganza)
(U)We will have a complete product out on TestNet in Q2, and a fully working cross-chain exchange on the NEO and Ethereum networks in Q3.
NEX is marketing to two primary groups of users: (1) Mainstream users who want an easier experience buying altcoins with cryptocurrency. Through our network of banking partners, we will make it easy for anyone in the world to buy tokens on NEO, ETH (and eventually other chains) using their national currencies. (2) Bots and traders: we aim to have best-in-class trading APIs for high performance, computational trading. We will have better and faster APIs than today's centralized exchanges, with the added benefit of these systems running on decentralized networks
The point of our off-chain matching engine tech is to enable the same (or better!) usability as an exchange like Binance, while keeping around the decentralized model. The off-chain engine makes trading just as performant as today's centralized exchanges, and makes it much easier to support the kind of cross-chain trading functionality that has long been a pipe dream for decentralized exchanges. We are very much inspired by other exchanges like Coinbase in this regard, and we will be the first DEX to achieve this.
(C) Just to remember that NEX is also going after costumers that usually are not considered by other exchanges with its features to facilitate peer to peer payments requests, invoicing and tipping/gifts.
Q:Can you elaborate on NEX staking? The whitepaper was fuzzy about it and had terms like "staking percentage". (u/r3dh4r7)
(U) The NEX staking rate will be from 25-75%. Committing to stake for one day gives a rate of 25%, which increases linearly to a rate of 75% if you are willing to stake for 2 years By staking rate, we mean the percentage of revenue you will get from NEX fee collection proportional to the tokens you hold. For example, if you hold 10% of all NEX tokens and are staking at a rate of 75%, then you will receive .10 * .75 = 7.5% of all fee revenue generated by NEX over that period.
We will confirm these details in an updated white paper release coming out today or tomorrow. ~ If you commit for two years, the first year will still be at 75%.
Q:How soon do you introduce Fiat pairs? (u/coinonymous1)
(U) Our network of banking partners will begin to go live in Q2. That means users will be able to enter the ecosystem with national currencies through the NEX extension and web-based exchange interface.
(C) To clarify, this are not direct trading pairs on the exchange itself (i.e. JPY/NEX) but a easy method to on ramp and cashout using the tools. Users will be able to acquire NEO and GAS with fiat and any other tokens traded at NEX will be using the exchange itself.
Q: The chrome extension is great but why should I still rely on desktop to access NEX interface ? When can we expect Iphone/ Android App? (u/cryptobuddy_1712)
(U) We are planning native android/iOS apps. Depending on how fast we can grow, they may be out by Q3.
(C) Mobile presence is a complex topic, depending of how much of the full experience you want to provide - that will depend on the support shown by 3rd party wallets, if they adopt NEX APIs.
Q: Will you guys be supporting Ledger integration any time soon? Nex chrome add-on, Nex exchange integration...?! Plans to list the Nex token on other exchanges before the release of your own? What are the plans to continue supporting Neon wallet now that Nex came out with their extension for chrome? Will Nex exchange introduce fiat deposits/withdrawals? (u/mihai_ss)
(U) Yes, ledger is on the roadmap. We cannot comment on other exchange listings right now. We love and will continue to support Neon wallet (you are speaking to its creator :) as a great desktop wallet and complementary partner to our extension. NEX will support national currencies in/out of the exchange through our network of banking partners.
(C) Not only ledger but hardware wallets in general. Ledger is priority currently given that it is quite popular in NEO. We have to have in mind that NEX is trying to do a lot of different things to make usage easier to new users (that probably don't have a ledger!), there is currently about 96k users of it (more than this sub) so we will focus on fixing the corner cases and issues that appears frequently with such large user base first.
Q:More and more people are using mobile apps for trading. Don't you think nex should also have its own iOS and Android app. Are the API being developed future proof to integrate with mobile apps for trading and seeing candle charts. (u/Cryptobanku)
(U) We agree with the power for mobile, and future proofing the API is 100% on our mind. Longer term, we are planning native iOS/android apps.
Q:So NEX is a security right? What does that mean exactly? The Token only will be available on the neon exchange? In order to get the exchange dividends are we gonna be forced to put our tokens on stake mode? If so, once we put our tokens on stake mode does that mean we are not gonna be able to move them or sell them for a specific period of time? (u/sersimovi)
(U) NEX is a registered European security. It will be traded on NEX exchange, but that is not the only place it will be traded (I cannot say more than that right now). Being a registered security is amazing for investors. It means that all of the sketchy things that so often happen with cryprocurrencies/tokens (things like market manipulation or insider trading) are made explicitly illegal. It also means that we, as a company, go through an extensive audit. For that, we have partnered with the top tier accounting firm Ernst and Young.
The staking model means that you commit to staking your NEX for a certain amount of time to receive a share of fee revenue. The minimum amount of time you can stake NEX is one day. The maximum time you can stake is two years. While staked, you cannot move or sell the NEX tokens.
(C) All that plus the investor don't need to fear it will crash because someone classified it as a security in the future.
Q:When will the official sale date be announced and when will the official tokens per neo be determined? (u/rborsb9)
(L) We are still working with our legal partners to determine a final sale date, but it will be sometime at the end of April. The tokens per Neo/Gas will be determined from the 10 day moving average of the price before the sale begins.
Q:What do you think sets NEX apart from the countless other DEXs that are starting up right now? Why should people invest in NEX vs Switcheo/Etherdelta/Binance(once they release)?
(U) NEX will be the first usable, performant, and cross-chain DEX. Out of all the exchanges you mentioned, none of them are using an off-chain matching engine, which quite simply means none of them can do what we are doing.
In addition to that, NEX has by far the most generous revenue share model of any exchange you have mentioned. This is because we are embracing being a security (not hiding behind some questionably legal utility token). The people who invest in us will be treated very well by this model.
As for competitors: Switcheo unfortunately doesn't work. There is no volume, and the SC is broken (or at least didn't work when I tried it; the transaction failed and it stole the small amount of GAS I tried to trade). Etherdelta has higher volume but still ridiculously low overall. And again, just try to use Etherdelta... it is a usability disaster. There is really no comparison here. Binance might do something interesting, if they decide to do anything. But we have better technical talent than Binance, so I am not too worried.
Q:What % volume neon exchange will support compared with top centralized exchanges? Thanks big neo fan! (u/myfriendbaubau)
(U) We will support just as much volume as today's centralized exchanges.
Q: Will NEX have a stable coin? (u/masi252)
(U) We have looked into various implementations and ideas surrounding stable coins and have determined that it is not something we are planning on doing in the near future.
Cont: What about when Alchemint releases? (u/Bing0to)
(C) We wanted to do a fundamental strong stable coin that was capital efficient. Unfortunately there is some pre-requisites for that to be possible that currently is lacking in crypto markets. We will continue to monitor how this space evolves and our ideas are stored waiting the future when they can be applied.
Q:Can we expect the erc20 token trading earlier than q3? (u/markerizza)
(U) Q3 is the current roadmap projection. It is possible it will happen earlier depending on our growth.
Q: Will the token sale be via smart contract, so that we recieve our tokens right away? (u/Ebrii)
(U) Yes
Q: will you guys have an official subreddit and telegram anytime soon? (u/markerizza)
(U) No, we dislike the idea of project oriented telegrams. There are too many opportunities for scammers. We may have a subreddit in the future, but not anytime soon.
Q: What is the plan to get liquidity on the platform? It seems to be the biggest problem with current DEXs. (u/Mutedtommy)
(U) We have strategic partnerships for this. We are also working with other partners to develop some nice APIs for high performance trading.
Q: On the site you say that the ORIGINAL winners can participate in the second round (9000$) options, do you mean only the first round lottery winners or the first and second round winners combined? (u/FrancoisFrancis)
(U) Any lottery winners (whether first or second draw) have the opportunity to participate in both rounds 1 and 2. Please see this medium post for clarification: https://medium.com/neon-exchange/nex-extension-and-lottery-q-a-667e56f58e4a
Q: If you chose to participate in round 2 from the KYC process, does that mean you are guaranteed a spot? The medium article seems to indicate there will be an additional lottery from those who selected that option to see who from round one is eligible for round 2. (u/DwyerMatt)
No one is guaranteed a spot in round 2. It is even possible (though extremely unlikely) that all NEX is sold out in round one. This would happen if everyone who is selected goes through KYC and participates at 100%. (U)
Q: Will NEX tokens only be tradeable on NEX or is there a chance of it being listed on other exchanges like Binance? (u/Frank_Sinatra88)
(U) See an answer above. Not just NEX, but I can't say more than that right now.
Q: How do you see NEO compare to other coins on its network ? Like another coin could be valued more than NEO itself ? And will NEX always be bound to NEO? (u/BN_Boi)
(U) It is unlikely but possible that a NEP5 token could eventually achieve a higher marketcap than NEO itself.
NEX is not bound to NEO much at all. Our token will live as a NEP5 on NEO, and that is how users will receive staking rewards, but we will support trading very early on Ethereum as well.
(C) Google runs atop of other companies infrastructure (telecom providers), but it is valued more than all of them. The same thing can (and probably will) happen in token land, it will just take a while - when infrastructure becomes less important than applications and platforms atop of it. Like with the internet.
NEX behind the scenes (as the DEX is cross-chain from start) is using NEO capabilities, but the future of both is broad and uncertain. As a long term strategy the NEX company will do what it can to improve its underling technology and remove risk from its business.
Q: Is there a vesting period for the half of available NEX tokens that will not be sold during the ICO? (u/ETHERjimbo)
(U) The founder and employee tokens (25%) will vest over two years.
Q: Whitepaper uses an example $100m in the fee distribution calculation. If NEX is truly a security token and the whitepaper is your prospectus then you must provide further data on fwd looking statements. The NEX token gives the right to fee distribution. Given this you must provide assumption based forecasts on expedited fees over the next 3 years. This will support price discovery. How can the market properly price the token when fee expectations are unknown.(u/nsheahan82)
(C) Fee structure is defined on whitepaper and version v1.1 contains a example section as stated. Version v2.0 (to be released very soon) contains the actual staking portion (25% to 75% linear over two years growth on staking).
Guess work on the volume would in reality be very indigenous, look at volume behavior market wise (https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/bitcoin/#charts) so much variation. Following the 3 years trend we could say trading volume will be bigger than the world economy, clearly that is not happening.
Q: Would NEX Staking be a 50% or 75% as stated on the whitepaper? (u/GMDaddy)
(C)See answer above, it starts at 25% and goes up to 75%. The increase is linear and maximum period is 2 years.
Cont: By linear, you mean like as an option where the user has the choice on picking whether to stake it from 25% up into 75%?
(C)No, when you start staking it starts at 25% and by linear I mean it increases at a constant rate of about 2.08% per month for two years until it reach 75%.
(U)To clarify fabio's comment: yes, you can choose a fixed rate of 75% by committing to stake for two years.
Q: A massive attraction to NEX is the prospect of decentralised banking. What makes decentralised banking better than traditional banking? (u/kabelofthe3rd)
(C)Our goal is to facilitate crypto trading at large, this touches from usage of applications to investing passing by funds management and invoicing solutions. What this enables is a digital cashless economy, we call it the smart economy. In the smart economy users are in control of their funds using this advanced technological tools to perform the tasks above and current banking solutions are no longer needed.
Q: Once NEX is rolled out, what will be the easiest way for US residents to buy some stake? I'm aware it's going to be issued as a security so I'm thinking the NEX token will only be tradable on NEX itself because most non decentralized exchanges will not list security's or tokens that don't pass the Howet Test. Is this correct?(u/Cozmo525)
(C)You are correct, for US persons you will need to wait other licensed exchanges list NEX or we acquire the proper licenses to allow US people to trade securities. Whatever happens first =)
Q: Can I stake only NEX or also other Token f.e. NEO? (u/masi252)
(C) NEO doesn't need to be staked, you already can claim GAS on NEX extension.
Q: How do you plan to compete with Switcheo when they have first movers advantage and will be live for months before your platform will be? (u/toneeey1)
(C)We plan to compete with anyone in our market by providing better products.
Q: Will TNC be utilized? (u/molly1nora)
(C)That is not planned, NEX has it own custom scaling solutions already in development.
Q: Do you see exchanges not listing NEX, due to the fact that you guys are direct competition? (u/detnah)
(C)That is a tricky question, I believe competition will not be with every exchange - in special centralized ones, as CEX they will more focused in national markets and we are going after broad chain level trade.
Q: Is there a chance in the future you will also introduce other coins to the exchange sich as ERC-20 tokens etc? If so you'd blow all competition out the water. (u/Frank_Sinatra88)
(C)Yes, ERC-20 tokens will be supported by Q3 together with NEP-5.
Q: Will NEX APIs support mobile Dapps or Wallets? (u/johndon96)
(C)Both, APIs are in general not target to a specific application, is up to the developers to use it in their products.
Q: What are the team's plans to make NEX the best decentralized exchange and one of the best projects ever released? (u/its_me_TAG)
(C)We will be working close to our costumers, never afraid of breaking status quo and never ending improvements. NEX will never be done.
Q: Are there any plans to open up some Nex-Stores in several spots around the Globe? (u/michaeluebelhart)
(C)No, but will have a online swag store :D
Q: Is it possible that in the long future to have forex pairs listed on NEX? (u/BR8889)
(C)In a future where fiat has token representations or stable coins are indeed stable.
Q: When will we see the updated Whitepaper? (I know for example that you plan to integrate ERC20 tokens earlier than mentioned in the original Whitepaper) (u/mambor)
(C) Target is this weekend. We could delay if redacting detects things that should be changed/improved.
Q: What is your go-to-market strategy? (u/Dux_AMS)
(C) We already have >100k users. ;)
submitted by menofthenorth to NEO [link] [comments]

Q4 Community Update Email From Richard Ells

Hi Everyone!
We are coming to the close of 2018 and whilst cryptocurrency in general has had a year of turmoil, it has been a very positive year for Electroneum and I’d like to recap on what we’ve achieved this year and reveal some of what we have planned for next year. This might end up as an epic, Tolstoy length, email so my apologies if it’s too long for you – but I feel there’s a lot to say…
Firstly, let’s remember that we set out to redefine cryptocurrency altogether. Before Electroneum there were NO cryptocurrencies that were designed from the start to be widely and easily adopted. We have started to achieve the primary goal of Electroneum which is adoption. Did you know that Electroneum is the fastest growing cryptocurrency in the history of the world (I was going to say “Universe” but I really don’t know what our competitors are doing in other spiral arms of this galaxy, let alone the entire universe). Hold on! Let’s just think about that for a second! We have grown our user numbers to over 2 million holders and users of ETN in just one year. We fit the real world usage of cryptocurrency better than ANY other.
Biggest (and best) community in crypto!
Electroneum has done something here that’s never been achieved elsewhere. We have an enormous community of advocates. Users who are more than just users, they are passionate about what Electroneum is trying to do. A quick Google search of any cryptocurrency will find you some videos and some images, but with ETN there is an enormous following of hundreds of thousands of amazing people who are helping to make ETN a success. Electroneum has Fan Art. Think about that. A “boring” financial product with fan art! I’ve never seen any credit card fan art or banking fan art! If you are one of the passionate ETN believers and advocates, then I’d like to say a whopping THANK YOU to you for your input, no matter how small. You can (and are) changing the world.
Boring Statistics?
A former British Prime Minister famously quoted “There are lies, damned lies and statistics”. This is certainly true of the cryptocurrency market and as such we’ve just installed the Alexa.com (part of Amazon) certified traffic stats tool onto our website. That shows statistics for ONLY real people. You can’t fake it or exaggerate it. Did you know that if you compare the web traffic of all cryptocurrencies – we are in the top 5. If you look at active wallet numbers and actual blockchain transaction numbers, we are in the top 10 of cryptocurrencies for both. We have achieved a great deal this year, by making ETN accessible to everyone who has a smartphone.
Electroneum Lead the Market
2018 has seen us launch our Instant Payment system into BETA, be the first cryptocurrency to offer a payment integration API allowing vendors to easily accept cryptocurrency for instant transactions. We are working with the community to create easy payment plugins for all the popular ecommerce software and we’ve launched a number of them including WooCommerce which enables over 3m WooCommerce sites to accept ETN with around 15 minutes of work. I can’t overstate how important this instant payment framework is to us achieving our goals. It is a huge leap forwards for cryptocurrency. We’ve seen some great vendors come on board this year and next year I am confident we will see a huge surge of vendors, once we get live on the ground in a few strategic areas.
We are the first cryptocurrency to formally adopt KYC (know your customer – which now officially goes live on the 27th December). As the authorities of the world start to accept and understand cryptocurrency you will see why our early adoption of a regulatory framework is important to growth. Governments of the world fear cryptocurrency. We are giving them something to embrace.
We have produced hundreds of thousands of lines of code this year. I’ve seen a lot of projects talk about valuations of crypto projects based on Github Commits (this is a place where people store their open source code). Electroneum is different to most cryptocurrencies. It has both open source blockchain code that anyone is welcome to help work on AND closed source code that runs the back end such as the app, the instant payment system, and the custodial wallet system. These are the features that are making Electroneum a success and make us a real business that corporations, governments, NGOs and institutions can feel comfortable with.
The Bright Future of ETN…
This year has been a year of preparing. Growing the team (not everyone in the team wants their picture on the website – we have over 30 full time employees and access to many more part time resources).
MWC Sees Launch of Two or More Major Things…
Last year we attended MWC (mobile world congress) as the first cryptocurrency member of the GSMA. Next February we attend again (you are going to LOVE our stand, nobody has ever done anything like it!). This time we are attending with a full product and exciting news.
We launch a number of things at that show, all of which are secret for now. Two are locked in as absolutes and there are a few more than we are trying to tie in with the show! I don’t want to hint at what is coming – it’s only a couple of months before you’ll see for yourself, but it will be the base block from which we demonstrate to the business world just how usable cryptocurrency can be.
Apple iOS Launch (finally!)… and Cloud Mining too!
The first week of January will see our iOS app that includes cloud mining go into 100 user BETA. The second week we will release it to our 5000+ iOS testflight users (still in BETA) and (subject to testing) should be in the Apple Store by the end of January.
Cloud Mining for Android
Cloud mining will make the distribution of ETN much more appealing to the target audience of the unbanked. Ironically with their lower powered hardware and sporadic internet access it has been the developed world that has found it easiest to obtain some ETN. That all changes with cloud mining, where someone with the latest Samsung or iPhone will get the same value in ETN as someone with an ancient smartphone and little internet access.
We can launch cloud mining for Android subject to the successful testing on Apple devices. I think it is going to be a big success and I expect to see it on Android before the MWC show in February.
Blockchain
As you probably know we used the Monero blockchain as a stable base for the Electroneum Blockchain when we launched. We’ve been moving away from Monero and have removed many of the privacy features of Monero during 2018. 2019 will see even more privacy removed, although we intend to keep stealth addresses, to prevent vendors (or anyone else) looking into your wallet and seeing how much ETN you have – like you can with Bitcoin and Ethereum.
Some say we are not doing anything particularly different or unique with the blockchain part of our project, but the reality is that we are doing the single most important thing there is with blockchain - we are making it useable in everyday life.
Credit Card Purchase of ETN & Gig Economy
This week has been a particularly busy week with a few new exchanges coming on board and a launch of a very important part of our future “Gig Economy” system. You can now purchase ETN quickly and simply with a credit card at Indacoin (https://www.indacoin.com/en_GB/change/buy-electroneum-with-cardusd). We are working on others especially for the US citizens which indacoin currently does not cover.
This is important as when we launch our Gig Economy website in Q1 of 2019 it will enable the unbanked of the world to join the global economy when looking for work. This is one of the major areas that we see for opening up the world to understanding the power of cryptocurrency as people in developed nations become able to purchase digital services from the people of developing nations, with no barriers.
Developed nation businesses can purchase ETN with a credit card and buy software development, data entry, virtual business services, design, data research, social media management and much, much more, from a growing market of millennial entrepreneurs in the developing market. Everyone wins. You’ll see way more of this in 2019 including an e-learning system that enables those with digital skills to remotely teach others, with an ETN incentive.
As I mentioned above this should be going live in Q1 – we are trying to get that live for MWC too, but I don’t want to commit 100% to that date for this project. The good news is that we have a lot of interest in it from an NGO perspective, so when we launch it I am confident it will be a really powerful force for both enablement and empowerment of individuals but also a huge catalyst for the growth and acceptance of cryptocurrency generally.
The 2018 Cryptocurrency Market
People have been asking me “WHY!? WHHHHYYYYYY?” to the 2018, pronounced, dip in the price of cryptocurrencies across the board and I’d like to offer you my view of the 2018 cryptocurrency market and what I believe the market will focus on in the future.
The cryptocurrency markets are very new and whilst they are often compared to more mature markets, such as the equities markets, I believe there are very FEW similarities.
Some people are buying and selling cryptocurrencies based on applying technical analysis, where they look at chart patterns in the historical price and volumes to try and predict the future, others are buying based on momentum, effectively following the herd and then there are the true project believers (known in the crypto industry as hodlers!) who have bought some because they believe in the long term viability and future success of the project.
Don’t worry… I’m getting to my point…
A lesson from Warren Buffet
One of the most successful conventional traders in the world is Warren Buffet – he’s pretty good at it too, having been the richest man in the world a few times. What should we learn from him? Firstly, he’s not a huge fan of Bitcoin, in fact, he hates the stuff. Why is this and what can we learn from him? Warren hates Bitcoin because he’s a value investor, and a very good one. He doesn’t believe in chart analysis and he’s not a fan of momentum trading. He invests in PEOPLE. He invests in TEAMS and he invests in REAL THINGS.
The cryptocurrency markets are largely coupled with Bitcoin. When it moves, the market moves, and at the moment it is almost entirely driven by the herd and not by people analysing VALUE.
Herds are happy to run off cliffs as well as away from danger, hence the large swings (in both directions of the cryptocurrency markets).
Obviously, I’m a huge fan of cryptocurrencies, so Warren and I are going to differ on some views, but I absolutely know that he would look at Electroneum in a different light to Bitcoin.
We have identified and created a model for blockchain coin emissions which allows us to create a global marketing opportunity which rewards users, partners and vendors for engagement.
We have spent time building products, solutions and partnerships rather than hyping them, meaning that most people are unaware of what has really been achieved in such a short time.
The Electroneum team are fortunate to have considerable relationships across distribution partners, working closely with a number them throughout the planning and creation of our ecosystem.
In our first year, we have developed, tested and launched a much wider set of products and partner benefits than anyone expected.
We are going in to 2019 as a gateway, with a toolkit and approach that enables partners, governments and entrepreneurs to benefit from cryptocurrency; no longer is it just trading or accumulation of crypto. We stimulate every day, continual usage in the real world.
We are focused on the fundamentals of traditional business, giving people what they want and helping to achieve financial inclusion and inclusivity, by creating an end to end ecosystem for everyday use of crypto, by anyone anywhere.
The combination of our ecosystem, our partners and the scale of our community puts us in an incredibly strong position to achieve our goals of opening the world economy to every person, including the 1.8 billion unbanked.
In short, Electroneum has an actual business behind it and is delivering REAL THINGS to REAL USERS (millions of them) via partnerships with other REAL companies. We deliver value and can show future revenue streams based on demonstrated growth. These are real life business things. We know our users and that is valuable. We have access to our users and that is valuable. We understand and can chart growth, and that is valuable. The list of differences goes on. Take a look at the metrics of some of the biggest tech “unicorns” and you’ll see they are all valued on the number of real, active USERS. The only reason they have that value is because they can communicate and monetise those users, and that is where the parallel to Electroneum becomes apparent. We have no intention of substantially monetising our user base for years to come, but we have the capability to do so – and all businesses MUST have a revenue stream or potential FUTURE revenue stream.
I believe in Bitcoin, and I see it as a kind of cryptocurrency gold, but because there is so much focus on fully decentralised systems that do not know their users and are run by anonymous miners, we will find that real value investors are wary of ALL cryptocurrencies because of the mistaken impression that they are all alike.
I agree that it is hard to make a purchase of Bitcoin based on fundamentals and value, because it’s not obvious where it lies. Scarcity and a belief in the project make me a Hodler, but I can’t put a ‘fair price’ on Bitcoin. Nobody can.
Cryptocurrencies are evolving. Electroneum is unarguably more technically useful than Bitcoin because of its speed, accessibility and ability to scale, but that is not ENOUGH.
I believe that as more REAL WORLD cryptocurrency projects evolve you will see VALUE as the main driver in the cryptocurrency markets.
If a cryptocurrency project is also a conventional company with the ability to drive profits, grow larger and become a dominant brand – THEN you will see conventional investors such as Warren Buffet entering the market.
I hope that cryptocurrency volatility will be reduced as cryptocurrencies start to look and feel more like regular companies, with friendly help desks, balance sheets, contractual partnerships and accountability.
When is this going to happen?... it’s already started…
I wish you and your family the very best Christmas or Holiday period,
Richard Ells Founder & CEO, Electroneum.com
submitted by xterest27 to Electroneum [link] [comments]

It's funny how weak hands show up in droves whenever Bitcoin's price is low...

...to tell everyone how blockchain technology is done and the market is officially over. lol
More accurately, they tend to show up when the price is relatively low, since weak hands usually buy at the very top and then come here to complain about the price being too low for them to buy 6 months later... but if you actually zoom out on the chart, you'll see that Bitcoin is worth much more today than it was exactly 1 year ago. In fact, many long term investors are still well into the green and don't share the same doom & gloom sentiment as weak hands do, as they've seen this show many times before.
Not only is this market still in its infancy stages, but with the constant evolution of blockchain technology, decentralized apps and exchanges, looming approval of security tokens, a potential BTC-backed exhange traded fund in the works... and yes, even sensible regulation on the horizon... the future of blockchain technology is poised to stick around not just for the rest of our lives, but many years into the future.
Those who can't see it today are the same type of shortsighted individuals who only focused on the day-to-day price back in 2014, 2015, and hell, even parts of 2017. They are akin to those who said the video game industry was dead back in the 80s, the internet would only be used by geeks in the 90s, and Apple iPhones wouldn't catch on in the 00s.
Yes, these are now the "Bitcoin is dead..." people of the 2010s.
submitted by L0di-D0di to Bitcoin [link] [comments]

OMG CoinBase Mobile App Automatically Bought Bitcoin at Worst Time!

Okay, “worst” is probably an exaggeration, and I’m somewhat at fault but I still really don’t know what the hell happened!
Around 5:30pm Pacific I saw Bitcoin prices going down. My verification at all the other exchanges have been pending for a week+ frustratingly, and I had no fiat in Coinbase/GDAX, so I bring up the Coinbase iPhone app just to see how much higher it was selling Bitcoin at compared to its own chart. For some stupid reason on my part, I punched in $250 USD and saw that I could buy around .016354 BTC at $15,164, which was about $150 higher than what the chart was showing.
I’m at work and get distracted by, you know, actual work, so I put my phone down with the screen still up and start using my computer. I’m not paying attention to the screen for at most a few minutes (my iPhone auto locks after 5m, so it had to be shorter than that), and I see out of the corner of my eye the screen redrawing like it’s loading something. I see it flash a message like “Congratulations! You just purchased...” and I pick up my phone like WTF?!?
Of course I can’t cancel, and I know, I’m just gonna HODL, but I didn’t necessarily want to give Coinbase more business (though my hands are tied if I want to buy the dip while waiting verification), and I was watching the prices go down and definitely would have waited a little longer to see it go down to $13.5k and then buy around then.
I know it’s already back up to $14.7k and could go back down or up again, but it’s the fact that I didn’t even execute the transaction that really gets me. I know some will doubt how it was even possible, but maybe it was a one in a million glitch. Has anyone else experienced this?
Anyway, please Gemini, Kraken, Bitstamp, hurry with your verification already!
submitted by bionic_bi_tween to Bitcoin [link] [comments]

US Futures, Global Markets Slide, Spooked By Trump Trade Comments

US index futures and European shares slumped on Tuesday in a volatile, illiquid session punctuated by some headline confusion, while gains in Asian equities were limited after President Donald Trump said he still intends to go ahead with raising tariffs on China imports from 10% to 25% and that it was highly unlikely he would accept China’s request to refrain from the increase, just days before meeting with his counterpart Xi Jinping.

While ES losses were modest, it is worth noting that earlier in the session, S&P futures swung sharply, gaining as much as 0.5%, then falling back into negative territory, after algos misinterpreted comments from China foreign ministry spokesman Geng Shuang. As we reported earlier, during a media briefing Geng first said that Presidents Trump and Xi agreed to reach mutually beneficial agreements, sparking a vicious rally in futures. Just moments later, however, futures erased gains when Geng later said he was referring to a phone call on Nov. 1. The result was the following:

Following these fireworks, contracts on the Dow, S&P and Nasdaq pointed to a drop at the opening, while Treasuries and the dollar held steady before the Fed’s top two officials were set to speak in the next 48 hours.
European equities gave up initial gains and posted small losses as basic resources and travel names underperformed, with the Stoxx Europe 600 Index edging modestly lower (-0.1%), led by raw materials producers, while bonds rose across Europe and the euro currency edged lower. The pound weakened as traders mulled prospects for parliamentary approval of the Brexit deal, which Trump said could jeopardize Britain’s ability to strike a trade pact with the U.S.
Earlier in the session, Asian markets were mostly positive as the region took impetus from the performance on Wall St, where all majors finished with firm gains on return from the Thanksgiving weekend and with retailers buoyed on the back of Black Friday and Cyber Monday sales. ASX 200 (+1.0%) and Nikkei 225 (+0.6%) were lifted from the open with Australia led higher by tech and financials, while a pullback in USD/JPY limited the upside for the Japanese benchmark. Elsewhere, Hang Seng (-0.2%) and Shanghai
Comp. (+0.1%) were mixed with China somewhat dampened by Trump’s hardball tactics ahead of the meeting with Chinese President Xi at this week’s G20, in which he suggested an intention to proceed with raising tariffs on China imports from 10% to 25% and also warned to place tariffs on the remaining USD 267bln of Chinese imports if they fail to reach a favourable outcome for the US. Furthermore, a slowdown of Chinese Industrial Profit growth and concerns in the Hong Kong property sector also contributed the cautiousness in Chinese markets.
In addition to today's 8:30am ET comments from Fed vice chair Clarida, trade remains firmly in investors’ minds before leaders of the two biggest economies meet in Buenos Aires at the end of the week. Trump's comments that it is likely the US will slap tariffs on the remaining Chinese imports and raise tariffs on existing tariffed products have weighed on optimism for U.S. stocks, which climbed on Monday amid hopes a strong start to the holiday season thanks to record online sales will keep growth on track.
Meanwhile, Fed speakers will be closely watched for any indications of a change in Fed thinking over continued rate hikes. Today Fed vice chair's New York speech at 8:30am will be the main attraction, while Chair Powell’s speech on Wednesday will be parsed for any hints on prospects for a pause in rate increases next year after traders reduced expectations for the pace of monetary policy tightening.
Elsewhere, emerging market currencies weakened and their shares traded little changed. Bitcoin steadied near $3,700 after plunging 14 percent Monday.
In overnight political news, US Special Counsel Mueller's office said former Trump campaign manager Manafort lied to FBI and Special Counsel in violation of plea agreement.
In commodities, Brent (+0.2%) and WTI (Unch) are nursing initial losses as focus starts turning to the G20 summit over the weekend where markets may get initial hints of what to expect at the Dec 6th OPEC meeting in Vienna. The Saudi Crown Prince, Russian President and US President are to meet, possibly on the side-lines to decide the future of the global oil market. Talk around the market notes that Prince Mohammed Bin Salman may not able to defy US President Trump’s aim for lower oil prices after the White House stood behind the prince in regard to the killing of journalist Khashoggi. Nonetheless, traders will be watching the summit closely, while in the nearer-term, today will see the release of the weekly API where forecasts see headline crude stockpiles printing a drawdown of 0.6mln barrels.
Gold is trading relatively flat as the dollar holds steady following comments from Trump that overnight that he still intends to raise Chinese import tariffs to 25%; these comments come ahead of this week’s G20 summit. Additionally, US-China trade pessimism has caused copper prices to fall for the 3rd consecutive session due to demand concerns. Iron ore futures have dropped to their lowest level in over 4 months, dropping by 5% over concerns that steel prices are to remain pressured by slower demand.
Expected data include Conference Board Consumer Confidence. Bank of Nova Scotia, Couche-Tard, and Salesforce are among companies reporting earnings.
Market Snapshot
Top Overnight News from Bloomberg
Asian equity markets were mostly positive as the region took impetus from the performance on Wall St, where all majors finished with firm gains on return from the Thanksgiving weekend and with retailers buoyed on the back of Black Friday and Cyber Monday sales. ASX 200 (+1.0%) and Nikkei 225 (+0.6%) were lifted from the open with Australia led higher by tech and financials, while a pullback in USD/JPY limited the upside for the Japanese benchmark. Elsewhere, Hang Seng (-0.2%) and Shanghai Comp. (+0.1%) were mixed with China somewhat dampened by Trump’s hardball tactics ahead of the meeting with Chinese President Xi at this week’s G20, in which he suggested an intention to proceed with raising tariffs on China imports from 10% to 25% and also warned to place tariffs on the remaining USD 267bln of Chinese imports if they fail to reach a favourable outcome for the US. Furthermore, a slowdown of Chinese Industrial Profit growth and concerns in the Hong Kong property sector also contributed the cautiousness in Chinese markets. Finally, 10yr JGBs were uneventful as prices took a breather from its extended but gradual uptrend and with today’s 40yr auction largely ignored despite increases in the b/c and accepted prices.
Top Asian News - Hong Kong’s Home Market Suffering Worst Declines Since 2016 - Day Two Rebound in Asia Stocks Closes an Eye on Trade Rhetoric - Genting Malaysia Says Fox World Lawsuit Won’t Impact Operations
European cash indices gave up initial gains (Eurostoxx 50 -0.1%) following a relatively flat open after pre-market gains in index futures were short-lived. Equity futures staged a pre-cash open rally after it was reported that a Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman was quoted as stating that US President Xi and US President Trump had agreed to mutually beneficial agreements. However gains in futures markets were pared after it was later reported that this was in reference to a November 1st phone call and thus was viewed as stale by the market, particularly considering the hardball interview by Trump in the WSJ yesterday ahead of this week’s G20 summit. On an index basis, the SMI lags its peers (-0.5%) with Credit Suisse (-1.7%) lower following a broker
downgrade at Credit Suisse. In terms of sector specifics, performance is relatively mixed with slight underperformance in material names in-fitting with recent price action in the complex. To the upside, utility names modestly outperform, albeit the moves thus far across the board are relatively small in terms of magnitude. Individual movers this morning include Dialog Semiconductor (-1.4%) amid Apple-inspired losses (post-Trump threat of potential tariffs on iPhones and laptops), Apple share are down 1.7% pre-market. Elsewhere, Rexel (+1.9%) are firmer following a broker upgrade at Credit Suisse, Thomas Cook (-24.5%) shares are notably underperforming following a disappointing trading update, dragging Tui (-4.2%) lower in sympathy.
Top European News
In FX, the DXY was overall bid vs G10 counterparts with the aid of the GBP weakness due to the latest Brexit developments. Moreover, Citi’s rebalancing model points to modest USD buying vs. peers going into month end, while Nordea also notes tomorrow’s HIA which is the cut-off date if companies wish to convert foreign currency into USD along with SOMA that happens to fall on Friday as well. The index is currently hovering above 97.000 within a narrow range around the big figure.
In commodities, brent (+0.2%) and WTI (Unch) are nursing initial losses as focus starts turning to the G20 summit over the weekend where markets may get initial hints of what to expect at the Dec 6th OPEC meeting in Vienna. The Saudi Crown Prince, Russian President and US President are to meet, possibly on the side-lines to decide the future of the global oil market. Talk around the market notes that Prince Mohammed Bin Salman may not able to defy US President Trump’s aim for lower oil prices after the White House stood behind the prince in regard to the killing of journalist Khashoggi. Nonetheless, traders will be watching the summit closely, while in the nearer-term, today will see the release of the weekly API where forecasts see headline crude stockpiles printing a drawdown of 0.6mln barrels. Gold is trading relatively flat as the dollar holds steady following comments from Trump that overnight that he still intends to raise Chinese import tariffs to 25%; these comments come ahead of this week’s G20 summit. Additionally, US-China trade pessimism has caused copper prices to fall for the 3rd consecutive session due to demand concerns. Iron ore futures have dropped to their lowest level in over 4 months, dropping by 5% over concerns that steel prices are to remain pressured by slower demand.
Looking at the day ahead, we’ll get various house price data points including the September FHFA house price index reading, Q3 house price purchase index reading and September S&P CoreLogic house price data. On top of that we’ll get the November consumer confidence survey which is expected to slip nearly 2pts to 135.8 in light of the recent wobbles in the equity market. That is, however, in the context of the 18-year high that the index reached last month. Away from the data, there will be plenty of focus on Fed Vice-Chair Clarida’s speech in New York today at 8.30am ET, especially around the topics of how he characterizes recent volatility in markets and the prospects for domestic and global growth. Fellow Fed officials Bostic, Evans and George will also speak while the ECB’s Nouy, Costa and Mersch also speak at various stages. It’s worth also noting that starting today and continuing until Thursday, the three top candidates to take over from Merkel as head of the CDU will hold panel debates.
US Event Calendar
DB's Jim Reid concludes the overnight wrap
We took our three year old Maisie to the building site that is our new house over the weekend and this may have been a mistake as over the last two days she keeps on asking us why our new house is broken. She was particularly upset that a lot of windows and walls were missing and said she doesn’t want to live there as it would be too cold. Meanwhile Daddy’s bank account feels broken this morning as there was talk yesterday that one of our big suppliers might be about to call in the administrators. They have a healthy deposit of ours so it’s very annoying. It’s fair to say that costs are escalating from all angles and the EMR may need to still be running from an old people’s home in 50 years time to fund this.
From broken houses to slightly less broken markets. Given that the two Mondays prior to yesterday had seen moves of -1.66% and -1.97% for the S&P 500, yesterday reversed the trend as better news percolated through on some of the negative stories that have dominated of late. The S&P 500 closed last night +1.56% with the DOW and NASDAQ also up +1.46% and +2.06% respectively. The NYFANG index advanced +3.72%, despite Apple’s underperformance (initially down -1.18% before rebounding to close +1.35%) as the US Supreme Court signalled its willingness to hear a class action lawsuit over its app store pricing. Financials really led the way with the S&P Banks index rallying +2.30% for its best day since July. They had their European counterparts to thank for that, with the STOXX Banks index (+2.91%) seeing its best single day performance since July 2017. The broader STOXX 600 closed +1.23% and DAX +1.45%.
Italy was the main catalyst as sentiment improved on the potential for more positive negotiations with the European Commission. As we reported yesterday, the weekend saw less confrontational remarks from Salvini and Juncker. In addition, Salvini said yesterday that the government is “not getting stuck” over the decimals in the deficit target while fellow Deputy Premier Di Maio confirmed that “if, as part of the negotiation, we need to reduce the forecast deficit slightly, that’s not important to us.” Di Maio went on to say that “the issue is not the conflict with the EU on a deficit of 2.4%, what’s important is that not even a single person is kept out of the core measures.” Prior to this, we also had headlines on Bloomberg suggesting that an official for the League had said that the Government was looking at a new deficit target of 2.2% to 2.3%. Late in the evening, political leaders Conte, Salvini, and Di Maio released a joint statement after their meeting, confirming their less confrontational tone and again deemphasising the decimal place of the deficit number.
As we go to print headline are coming through from Italian finance minister Castelli that the deficit target is “almost certain” to be 2.2%. The question on everyone’s lips is what is the compromise number that the European Commission could realistically accept? A deficit in the 2.2% area is still unlikely to satisfy the EC, however a willingness to negotiate might be seen as the Italian government being aware of the implications of its actions. The Commission could even accept a somewhat vague framework as a rationale to defer a formal decision on Italy until into 2019, potentially alleviating some of the near-term event risk for Italy-linked
assets.
Before all this news the FTSE MIB closed yesterday up +2.77% while Italian Banks (+4.83%) had their best day since June. Two- and ten-year BTPs rallied -11.2bps and -13.8bps respectively – albeit off their yield lows for the session. Speaking of Italy, the ECB’s Peter Praet said yesterday that there has been very limited spill-over from a tightening of financial conditions in Italy to the broader Euro Area, but that conditions in Italy are “unsustainable” and “so something will have to give.” Praet’s general tone outside of this was constructive. His comments suggested that QE will finish in December as widely expected, but also that the ECB will have to clarify was it meant by “reinvesting for an extended period of time.” Praet also confirmed that guidance is “a very strong expectation” but also noted that “downside risks have increased noticeably.” This was notable as the Council has previously said that risks are “balanced.” Praet’s speech raised the anticipation levels for Draghi, who spoke in the afternoon. While his speech was virtually a copy and paste from his last on November 16th, he was later quoted as saying that “world growth momentum has slowed considerably” which is much stronger language compared to that used in the past. The December 13 ECB meeting will be key, and our economists still expect the Governing Council to announce the end of QE. Incoming data will dictate the evolution of policy, but we still expect growth and inflation to progress sufficiently to allow for an interest rate hike in September 2019.
Praet and Draghi are scheduled to speak again this week, on Wednesday and Thursday, respectively. We’ll also get several consequential communications from Federal Reserve officials, with speeches scheduled today for Vice Chair Clarida, tomorrow for Chair Powell, and Friday for NY Fed President Williams. The bottom line so far is that he doesn’t think there is sufficient evidence to ratify the market’s dovish interpretation of recent Fed communications, though that could change depending on what the Fed leadership says about the neutral rate, financial conditions, and global growth. So an important couple of speeches today and tomorrow from Clarida and Powell.
This morning in Asia markets are largely higher with the Nikkei (+0.88%), Shanghai Comp (+0.42%) and Kospi (+0.84%) all up while the Hang Seng (+0.01%) is trading flat after erasing earlier losses. Sentiment seems to have been impacted by US President Trump’s rhetoric, after an interview with the WSJ, that he will likely push forward with plans to increase tariffs on $200 billion of Chinese goods. He also suggested that the US would likely impose tariffs on the remainder of Chinese imports ($267bn) if the trade talks on the sidelines of the G20 fail. So the pressure builds ahead of the summit. Futures on S&P 500 (-0.18%) are pointing towards a softer start.
Back to yesterday, Bund yields edged up +2.1bps yesterday with the Italy news more important than any ECB slowdown worries. That move for BTPs and Bunds means the spread between the two yesterday was -15.9bps tighter and now at the tightest level in nearly three weeks. Meanwhile Treasury yields also backed up +2.0bps and are now sitting at 3.06%. Oil had a part to play in that with Brent and Crude bouncing +3.13% and +2.54% respectively – despite the news that Saudi Arabia had again raised its oil output – perhaps with hopes that the oversupply condition will be addressed at the G20 this week or the OPEC meeting next week. Tensions between Russia and the Ukraine over the weekend seemed to have less of an impact.
Not hurting the decent day for equities yesterday was news of a merger in the Greek Banking sector, however a sub-index of Greek banks did give up an early morning surge of as much as +11.57% to finish flat. A pretty substantial move and retracement! In the US, the auto sector advanced +3.98% for its sixth best day of the year, after General Motors announced a broad new restructuring plan. It plans to cut over 14,000 jobs and close five North American manufacturing plants next year, barring an agreement with its unions. GM’s share price rose +4.79% to a four-month high.
Elsewhere on Brexit, Donald Trump has suggested PM May's Brexit agreement could threaten a US-UK trade deal. He told reporters the withdrawal agreement "sounds like a great deal for the EU" and meant the UK might not be able to trade with the US. The PM’s office insisted the deal is "very clear" the UK would be able to sign trade deals with countries around the world.
To the day ahead now, where this morning in Europe we’ll get November confidence indicators in France and Italy followed by the CBI’s retailing reported sales data in the UK for November. In the US this afternoon we’ll get various house price data points including the September FHFA house price index reading, Q3 house price purchase index reading and September S&P CoreLogic house price data. On top of that we’ll get the November consumer confidence survey which is expected to slip nearly 2pts to 135.8 in light of the recent wobbles in the equity market. That is, however, in the context of the 18-year high that the index reached last month. Away from the data, there will be plenty of focus on Fed Vice-Chair Clarida’s speech in New York today at 1.30pm GMT, especially around the topics of how he characterizes recent volatility in markets and the prospects for domestic and global growth. Fellow Fed officials Bostic, Evans and George will also speak this evening at 7.30pm GMT while the ECB’s Nouy, Costa and Mersch also speak at various stages. It’s worth also noting that starting today and continuing until Thursday, the three top candidates to take over from Merkel as head of the CDU will hold panel debates.
submitted by rotoreuters to zerohedge [link] [comments]

Observations and Discussion on Apple / Paypal competition

I think this news deserves a thread outside the DD so that it survives for several days, because we're going to be discussing it for a while I bet.
From Braintree Coinfire blog:
The system is slated to compete directly with Apple’s upcoming payment platform in that it will operate on a wide variety of devices.
So it's clear: paypal is competing directly against Apple.
There are two key differentiators for Paypal vs Apple (based on my expectations about apple's announcement - I'll update this if Apple proves me wrong)
.1. Paypal is device independent
Does anyone think Apple has the slightest interest in rolling out an Android payment app? Based on their usual MO my guess is that they're just trying to lock in iPhone sales. See also: iTunes for Android.
.2. Bitcoin
Does anyone here think Apple has the slightest interest in also integrating Bitcoin to level the playing field?
If so, it will simply double down on the legitimacy boost given to Bitcoin.
If not, then Bitcoin becomes a competitive weapon for PayPal versus Apple. The more popular Bitcoin is, the greater the advantage to PayPal. Might they try to game Bitcoin, to spark a rally (proven to drive adoption)?
If Paypal / Ebay buys Coinbase as is rumored how long before any PayPal user can purchase BTC through their Paypal account? How long before your PayPal wallet contains both USD and BTC and you can convert between them?
Scalability: If Paypal users can exchange BTC with each other using a "trusted" (in the sense that the users already trusted Paypal with their USD) off-blockchain system like Paypal, consider the possible scalability effects.
I'm curious to game this out. And where is the 800-lb gorilla(Amazon) in all of this?
Update: Apple set to announce 2 new large-screen iPhones, a watch, and NFC / mobile payments app. By all accounts the watch is flawed (poor battery life, possible engineering snafus that could make it unavailable this Christmas) and the phones are incremental upgrades. And yet, the hype surrounding the announcement is completely off-the charts (they've rented out the Flint center, where they held the original Mac release). Is there some other product? Or are they overhyping? These products are not the "next big thing" or am I missing something?
submitted by tsontar to BitcoinMarkets [link] [comments]

Is anyone else freaked out by this whole blocksize debate? Does anyone else find themself often agreeing with *both* sides - depending on whichever argument you happen to be reading at the moment? And do we need some better algorithms and data structures?

Why do both sides of the debate seem “right” to me?
I know, I know, a healthy debate is healthy and all - and maybe I'm just not used to the tumult and jostling which would be inevitable in a real live open major debate about something as vital as Bitcoin.
And I really do agree with the starry-eyed idealists who say Bitcoin is vital. Imperfect as it may be, it certainly does seem to represent the first real chance we've had in the past few hundred years to try to steer our civilization and our planet away from the dead-ends and disasters which our government-issued debt-based currencies keep dragging us into.
But this particular debate, about the blocksize, doesn't seem to be getting resolved at all.
Pretty much every time I read one of the long-form major arguments contributed by Bitcoin "thinkers" who I've come to respect over the past few years, this weird thing happens: I usually end up finding myself nodding my head and agreeing with whatever particular piece I'm reading!
But that should be impossible - because a lot of these people vehemently disagree!
So how can both sides sound so convincing to me, simply depending on whichever piece I currently happen to be reading?
Does anyone else feel this way? Or am I just a gullible idiot?
Just Do It?
When you first look at it or hear about it, increasing the size seems almost like a no-brainer: The "big-block" supporters say just increase the blocksize to 20 MB or 8 MB, or do some kind of scheduled or calculated regular increment which tries to take into account the capabilities of the infrastructure and the needs of the users. We do have the bandwidth and the memory to at least increase the blocksize now, they say - and we're probably gonna continue to have more bandwidth and memory in order to be able to keep increasing the blocksize for another couple decades - pretty much like everything else computer-based we've seen over the years (some of this stuff is called by names such as "Moore's Law").
On the other hand, whenever the "small-block" supporters warn about the utter catastrophe that a failed hard-fork would mean, I get totally freaked by their possible doomsday scenarios, which seem totally plausible and terrifying - so I end up feeling that the only way I'd want to go with a hard-fork would be if there was some pre-agreed "triggering" mechanism where the fork itself would only actually "switch on" and take effect provided that some "supermajority" of the network (of who? the miners? the full nodes?) had signaled (presumably via some kind of totally reliable p2p trustless software-based voting system?) that they do indeed "pre-agree" to actually adopt the pre-scheduled fork (and thereby avoid any possibility whatsoever of the precious blockchain somehow tragically splitting into two and pretty much killing this cryptocurrency off in its infancy).
So in this "conservative" scenario, I'm talking about wanting at least 95% pre-adoption agreement - not the mere 75% which I recall some proposals call for, which seems like it could easily lead to a 75/25 blockchain split.
But this time, with this long drawn-out blocksize debate, the core devs, and several other important voices who have become prominent opinion shapers over the past few years, can't seem to come to any real agreement on this.
Weird split among the devs
As far as I can see, there's this weird split: Gavin and Mike seem to be the only people among the devs who really want a major blocksize increase - and all the other devs seem to be vehemently against them.
But then on the other hand, the users seem to be overwhelmingly in favor of a major increase.
And there are meta-questions about governance, about about why this didn't come out as a BIP, and what the availability of Bitcoin XT means.
And today or yesterday there was this really cool big-blockian exponential graph based on doubling the blocksize every two years for twenty years, reminding us of the pure mathematical fact that 210 is indeed about 1000 - but not really addressing any of the game-theoretic points raised by the small-blockians. So a lot of the users seem to like it, but when so few devs say anything positive about it, I worry: is this just yet more exponential chart porn?
On the one hand, Gavin's and Mike's blocksize increase proposal initially seemed like a no-brainer to me.
And on the other hand, all the other devs seem to be against them. Which is weird - not what I'd initially expected at all (but maybe I'm just a fool who's seduced by exponential chart porn?).
Look, I don't mean to be rude to any of the core devs, and I don't want to come off like someone wearing a tinfoil hat - but it has to cross people's minds that the powers that be (the Fed and the other central banks and the governments that use their debt-issued money to run this world into a ditch) could very well be much more scared shitless than they're letting on. If we assume that the powers that be are using their usual playbook and tactics, then it could be worth looking at the book "Confessions of an Economic Hitman" by John Perkins, to get an idea of how they might try to attack Bitcoin. So, what I'm saying is, they do have a track record of sending in "experts" to try to derail projects and keep everyone enslaved to the Creature from Jekyll Island. I'm just saying. So, without getting ad hominem - let's just make sure that our ideas can really stand scrutiny on their own - as Nick Szabo says, we need to make sure there is "more computer science, less noise" in this debate.
When Gavin Andresen first came out with the 20 MB thing - I sat back and tried to imagine if I could download 20 MB in 10 minutes (which seems to be one of the basic mathematical and technological constraints here - right?)
I figured, "Yeah, I could download that" - even with my crappy internet connection.
And I guess the telecoms might be nice enough to continue to double our bandwidth every two years for the next couple decades – if we ask them politely?
On the other hand - I think we should be careful about entrusting the financial freedom of the world into the greedy hands of the telecoms companies - given all their shady shenanigans over the past few years in many countries. After decades of the MPAA and the FBI trying to chip away at BitTorrent, lately PirateBay has been hard to access. I would say it's quite likely that certain persons at institutions like JPMorgan and Goldman Sachs and the Fed might be very, very motivated to see Bitcoin fail - so we shouldn't be too sure about scaling plans which depend on the willingness of companies Verizon and AT&T to double our bandwith every two years.
Maybe the real important hardware buildout challenge for a company like 21 (and its allies such as Qualcomm) to take on now would not be "a miner in every toaster" but rather "Google Fiber Download and Upload Speeds in every Country, including China".
I think I've read all the major stuff on the blocksize debate from Gavin Andresen, Mike Hearn, Greg Maxwell, Peter Todd, Adam Back, and Jeff Garzick and several other major contributors - and, oddly enough, all their arguments seem reasonable - heck even Luke-Jr seems reasonable to me on the blocksize debate, and I always thought he was a whackjob overly influenced by superstition and numerology - and now today I'm reading the article by Bram Cohen - the inventor of BitTorrent - and I find myself agreeing with him too!
I say to myself: What's going on with me? How can I possibly agree with all of these guys, if they all have such vehemently opposing viewpoints?
I mean, think back to the glory days of a couple of years ago, when all we were hearing was how this amazing unprecedented grassroots innovation called Bitcoin was going to benefit everyone from all walks of life, all around the world:
...basically the entire human race transacting everything into the blockchain.
(Although let me say that I think that people's focus on ideas like driverless cabs creating realtime fare markets based on supply and demand seems to be setting our sights a bit low as far as Bitcoin's abilities to correct the financial world's capital-misallocation problems which seem to have been made possible by infinite debt-based fiat. I would have hoped that a Bitcoin-based economy would solve much more noble, much more urgent capital-allocation problems than driverless taxicabs creating fare markets or refrigerators ordering milk on the internet of things. I was thinking more along the lines that Bitcoin would finally strangle dead-end debt-based deadly-toxic energy industries like fossil fuels and let profitable clean energy industries like Thorium LFTRs take over - but that's another topic. :=)
Paradoxes in the blocksize debate
Let me summarize the major paradoxes I see here:
(1) Regarding the people (the majority of the core devs) who are against a blocksize increase: Well, the small-blocks arguments do seem kinda weird, and certainly not very "populist", in the sense that: When on earth have end-users ever heard of a computer technology whose capacity didn't grow pretty much exponentially year-on-year? All the cool new technology we've had - from hard drives to RAM to bandwidth - started out pathetically tiny and grew to unimaginably huge over the past few decades - and all our software has in turn gotten massively powerful and big and complex (sometimes bloated) to take advantage of the enormous new capacity available.
But now suddenly, for the first time in the history of technology, we seem to have a majority of the devs, on a major p2p project - saying: "Let's not scale the system up. It could be dangerous. It might break the whole system (if the hard-fork fails)."
I don't know, maybe I'm missing something here, maybe someone else could enlighten me, but I don't think I've ever seen this sort of thing happen in the last few decades of the history of technology - devs arguing against scaling up p2p technology to take advantage of expected growth in infrastructure capacity.
(2) But... on the other hand... the dire warnings of the small-blockians about what could happen if a hard-fork were to fail - wow, they do seem really dire! And these guys are pretty much all heavyweight, experienced programmers and/or game theorists and/or p2p open-source project managers.
I must say, that nearly all of the long-form arguments I've read - as well as many, many of the shorter comments I've read from many users in the threads, whose names I at least have come to more-or-less recognize over the past few months and years on reddit and bitcointalk - have been amazingly impressive in their ability to analyze all aspects of the lifecycle and management of open-source software projects, bringing up lots of serious points which I could never have come up with, and which seem to come from long experience with programming and project management - as well as dealing with economics and human nature (eg, greed - the game-theory stuff).
So a lot of really smart and experienced people with major expertise in various areas ranging from programming to management to game theory to politics to economics have been making some serious, mature, compelling arguments.
But, as I've been saying, the only problem to me is: in many of these cases, these arguments are vehemently in opposition to each other! So I find myself agreeing with pretty much all of them, one by one - which means the end result is just a giant contradiction.
I mean, today we have Bram Cohen, the inventor of BitTorrent, arguing (quite cogently and convincingly to me), that it would be dangerous to increase the blocksize. And this seems to be a guy who would know a few things about scaling out a massive global p2p network - since the protocol which he invented, BitTorrent, is now apparently responsible for like a third of the traffic on the internet (and this despite the long-term concerted efforts of major evil players such as the MPAA and the FBI to shut the whole thing down).
Was the BitTorrent analogy too "glib"?
By the way - I would like to go on a slight tangent here and say that one of the main reasons why I felt so "comfortable" jumping on the Bitcoin train back a few years ago, when I first heard about it and got into it, was the whole rough analogy I saw with BitTorrent.
I remembered the perhaps paradoxical fact that when a torrent is more popular (eg, a major movie release that just came out last week), then it actually becomes faster to download. More people want it, so more people have a few pieces of it, so more people are able to get it from each other. A kind of self-correcting economic feedback loop, where more demand directly leads to more supply.
(BitTorrent manages to pull this off by essentially adding a certain structure to the file being shared, so that it's not simply like an append-only list of 1 MB blocks, but rather more like an random-access or indexed array of 1 MB chunks. Say you're downloading a film which is 700 MB. As soon as your "client" program has downloaded a single 1-MB chunk - say chunk #99 - your "client" program instantly turns into a "server" program as well - offering that chunk #99 to other clients. From my simplistic understanding, I believe the Bitcoin protocol does something similar, to provide a p2p architecture. Hence my - perhaps naïve - assumption that Bitcoin already had the right algorithms / architecture / data structure to scale.)
The efficiency of the BitTorrent network seemed to jive with that "network law" (Metcalfe's Law?) about fax machines. This law states that the more fax machines there are, the more valuable the network of fax machines becomes. Or the value of the network grows on the order of the square of the number of nodes.
This is in contrast with other technology like cars, where the more you have, the worse things get. The more cars there are, the more traffic jams you have, so things start going downhill. I guess this is because highway space is limited - after all, we can't pave over the entire countryside, and we never did get those flying cars we were promised, as David Graeber laments in a recent essay in The Baffler magazine :-)
And regarding the "stress test" supposedly happening right now in the middle of this ongoing blocksize debate, I don't know what worries me more: the fact that it apparently is taking only $5,000 to do a simple kind of DoS on the blockchain - or the fact that there are a few rumors swirling around saying that the unknown company doing the stress test shares the same physical mailing address with a "scam" company?
Or maybe we should just be worried that so much of this debate is happening on a handful of forums which are controlled by some guy named theymos who's already engaged in some pretty "contentious" or "controversial" behavior like blowing a million dollars on writing forum software (I guess he never heard that reddit.com software is open-source)?
So I worry that the great promise of "decentralization" might be more fragile than we originally thought.
Scaling
Anyways, back to Metcalfe's Law: with virtual stuff, like torrents and fax machines, the more the merrier. The more people downloading a given movie, the faster it arrives - and the more people own fax machines, the more valuable the overall fax network.
So I kindof (naïvely?) assumed that Bitcoin, being "virtual" and p2p, would somehow scale up the same magical way BitTorrrent did. I just figured that more people using it would somehow automatically make it stronger and faster.
But now a lot of devs have started talking in terms of the old "scarcity" paradigm, talking about blockspace being a "scarce resource" and talking about "fee markets" - which seems kinda scary, and antithetical to much of the earlier rhetoric we heard about Bitcoin (the stuff about supporting our favorite creators with micropayments, and the stuff about Africans using SMS to send around payments).
Look, when some asshole is in line in front of you at the cash register and he's holding up the line so they can run his credit card to buy a bag of Cheeto's, we tend to get pissed off at the guy - clogging up our expensive global electronic payment infrastructure to make a two-dollar purchase. And that's on a fairly efficient centralized system - and presumably after a year or so, VISA and the guy's bank can delete or compress the transaction in their SQL databases.
Now, correct me if I'm wrong, but if some guy buys a coffee on the blockchain, or if somebody pays an online artist $1.99 for their work - then that transaction, a few bytes or so, has to live on the blockchain forever?
Or is there some "pruning" thing that gets rid of it after a while?
And this could lead to another question: Viewed from the perspective of double-entry bookkeeping, is the blockchain "world-wide ledger" more like the "balance sheet" part of accounting, i.e. a snapshot showing current assets and liabilities? Or is it more like the "cash flow" part of accounting, i.e. a journal showing historical revenues and expenses?
When I think of thousands of machines around the globe having to lug around multiple identical copies of a multi-gigabyte file containing some asshole's coffee purchase forever and ever... I feel like I'm ideologically drifting in one direction (where I'd end up also being against really cool stuff like online micropayments and Africans banking via SMS)... so I don't want to go there.
But on the other hand, when really experienced and battle-tested veterans with major experience in the world of open-souce programming and project management (the "small-blockians") warn of the catastrophic consequences of a possible failed hard-fork, I get freaked out and I wonder if Bitcoin really was destined to be a settlement layer for big transactions.
Could the original programmer(s) possibly weigh in?
And I don't mean to appeal to authority - but heck, where the hell is Satoshi Nakamoto in all this? I do understand that he/she/they would want to maintain absolute anonymity - but on the other hand, I assume SN wants Bitcoin to succeed (both for the future of humanity - or at least for all the bitcoins SN allegedly holds :-) - and I understand there is a way that SN can cryptographically sign a message - and I understand that as the original developer of Bitcoin, SN had some very specific opinions about the blocksize... So I'm kinda wondering of Satoshi could weigh in from time to time. Just to help out a bit. I'm not saying "Show us a sign" like a deity or something - but damn it sure would be fascinating and possibly very helpful if Satoshi gave us his/hetheir 2 satoshis worth at this really confusing juncture.
Are we using our capacity wisely?
I'm not a programming or game-theory whiz, I'm just a casual user who has tried to keep up with technology over the years.
It just seems weird to me that here we have this massive supercomputer (500 times more powerful than the all the supercomputers in the world combined) doing fairly straightforward "embarassingly parallel" number-crunching operations to secure a p2p world-wide ledger called the blockchain to keep track of a measly 2.1 quadrillion tokens spread out among a few billion addresses - and a couple of years ago you had people like Rick Falkvinge saying the blockchain would someday be supporting multi-million-dollar letters of credit for international trade and you had people like Andreas Antonopoulos saying the blockchain would someday allow billions of "unbanked" people to send remittances around the village or around the world dirt-cheap - and now suddenly in June 2015 we're talking about blockspace as a "scarce resource" and talking about "fee markets" and partially centralized, corporate-sponsored "Level 2" vaporware like Lightning Network and some mysterious company is "stess testing" or "DoS-ing" the system by throwing away a measly $5,000 and suddenly it sounds like the whole system could eventually head right back into PayPal and Western Union territory again, in terms of expensive fees.
When I got into Bitcoin, I really was heavily influenced by vague analogies with BitTorrent: I figured everyone would just have tiny little like utorrent-type program running on their machine (ie, Bitcoin-QT or Armory or Mycelium etc.).
I figured that just like anyone can host a their own blog or webserver, anyone would be able to host their own bank.
Yeah, Google and and Mozilla and Twitter and Facebook and WhatsApp did come along and build stuff on top of TCP/IP, so I did expect a bunch of companies to build layers on top of the Bitcoin protocol as well. But I still figured the basic unit of bitcoin client software powering the overall system would be small and personal and affordable and p2p - like a bittorrent client - or at the most, like a cheap server hosting a blog or email server.
And I figured there would be a way at the software level, at the architecture level, at the algorithmic level, at the data structure level - to let the thing scale - if not infinitely, at least fairly massively and gracefully - the same way the BitTorrent network has.
Of course, I do also understand that with BitTorrent, you're sharing a read-only object (eg, a movie) - whereas with Bitcoin, you're achieving distributed trustless consensus and appending it to a write-only (or append-only) database.
So I do understand that the problem which BitTorrent solves is much simpler than the problem which Bitcoin sets out to solve.
But still, it seems that there's got to be a way to make this thing scale. It's p2p and it's got 500 times more computing power than all the supercomputers in the world combined - and so many brilliant and motivated and inspired people want this thing to succeed! And Bitcoin could be our civilization's last chance to steer away from the oncoming debt-based ditch of disaster we seem to be driving into!
It just seems that Bitcoin has got to be able to scale somehow - and all these smart people working together should be able to come up with a solution which pretty much everyone can agree - in advance - will work.
Right? Right?
A (probably irrelevant) tangent on algorithms and architecture and data structures
I'll finally weigh with my personal perspective - although I might be biased due to my background (which is more on the theoretical side of computer science).
My own modest - or perhaps radical - suggestion would be to ask whether we're really looking at all the best possible algorithms and architectures and data structures out there.
From this perspective, I sometimes worry that the overwhelming majority of the great minds working on the programming and game-theory stuff might come from a rather specific, shall we say "von Neumann" or "procedural" or "imperative" school of programming (ie, C and Python and Java programmers).
It seems strange to me that such a cutting-edge and important computer project would have so little participation from the great minds at the other end of the spectrum of programming paradigms - namely, the "functional" and "declarative" and "algebraic" (and co-algebraic!) worlds.
For example, I was struck in particular by statements I've seen here and there (which seemed rather hubristic or lackadaisical to me - for something as important as Bitcoin), that the specification of Bitcoin and the blockchain doesn't really exist in any form other than the reference implementation(s) (in procedural languages such as C or Python?).
Curry-Howard anyone?
I mean, many computer scientists are aware of the Curry-Howard isomorophism, which basically says that the relationship between a theorem and its proof is equivalent to the relationship between a specification and its implementation. In other words, there is a long tradition in mathematics (and in computer programming) of:
And it's not exactly "turtles all the way down" either: a specification is generally simple and compact enough that a good programmer can usually simply visually inspect it to determine if it is indeed "correct" - something which is very difficult, if not impossible, to do with a program written in a procedural, implementation-oriented language such as C or Python or Java.
So I worry that we've got this tradition, from the open-source github C/Java programming tradition, of never actually writing our "specification", and only writing the "implementation". In mission-critical military-grade programming projects (which often use languages like Ada or Maude) this is simply not allowed. It would seem that a project as mission-critical as Bitcoin - which could literally be crucial for humanity's continued survival - should also use this kind of military-grade software development approach.
And I'm not saying rewrite the implementations in these kind of theoretical languages. But it might be helpful if the C/Python/Java programmers in the Bitcoin imperative programming world could build some bridges to the Maude/Haskell/ML programmers of the functional and algebraic programming worlds to see if any kind of useful cross-pollination might take place - between specifications and implementations.
For example, the JavaFAN formal analyzer for multi-threaded Java programs (developed using tools based on the Maude language) was applied to the Remote Agent AI program aboard NASA's Deep Space 1 shuttle, written in Java - and it took only a few minutes using formal mathematical reasoning to detect a potential deadlock which would have occurred years later during the space mission when the damn spacecraft was already way out around Pluto.
And "the Maude-NRL (Naval Research Laboratory) Protocol Analyzer (Maude-NPA) is a tool used to provide security proofs of cryptographic protocols and to search for protocol flaws and cryptosystem attacks."
These are open-source formal reasoning tools developed by DARPA and used by NASA and the US Navy to ensure that program implementations satisfy their specifications. It would be great if some of the people involved in these kinds of projects could contribute to help ensure the security and scalability of Bitcoin.
But there is a wide abyss between the kinds of programmers who use languages like Maude and the kinds of programmers who use languages like C/Python/Java - and it can be really hard to get the two worlds to meet. There is a bit of rapprochement between these language communities in languages which might be considered as being somewhere in the middle, such as Haskell and ML. I just worry that Bitcoin might be turning into being an exclusively C/Python/Java project (with the algorithms and practitioners traditionally of that community), when it could be more advantageous if it also had some people from the functional and algebraic-specification and program-verification community involved as well. The thing is, though: the theoretical practitioners are big on "semantics" - I've heard them say stuff like "Yes but a C / C++ program has no easily identifiable semantics". So to get them involved, you really have to first be able to talk about what your program does (specification) - before proceeding to describe how it does it (implementation). And writing high-level specifications is typically very hard using the syntax and semantics of languages like C and Java and Python - whereas specs are fairly easy to write in Maude - and not only that, they're executable, and you state and verify properties about them - which provides for the kind of debate Nick Szabo was advocating ("more computer science, less noise").
Imagine if we had an executable algebraic specification of Bitcoin in Maude, where we could formally reason about and verify certain crucial game-theoretical properties - rather than merely hand-waving and arguing and deploying and praying.
And so in the theoretical programming community you've got major research on various logics such as Girard's Linear Logic (which is resource-conscious) and Bruni and Montanari's Tile Logic (which enables "pasting" bigger systems together from smaller ones in space and time), and executable algebraic specification languages such as Meseguer's Maude (which would be perfect for game theory modeling, with its functional modules for specifying the deterministic parts of systems and its system modules for specifiying non-deterministic parts of systems, and its parameterized skeletons for sketching out the typical architectures of mobile systems, and its formal reasoning and verification tools and libraries which have been specifically applied to testing and breaking - and fixing - cryptographic protocols).
And somewhat closer to the practical hands-on world, you've got stuff like Google's MapReduce and lots of Big Data database languages developed by Google as well. And yet here we are with a mempool growing dangerously big for RAM on a single machine, and a 20-GB append-only list as our database - and not much debate on practical results from Google's Big Data databases.
(And by the way: maybe I'm totally ignorant for asking this, but I'll ask anyways: why the hell does the mempool have to stay in RAM? Couldn't it work just as well if it were stored temporarily on the hard drive?)
And you've got CalvinDB out of Yale which apparently provides an ACID layer on top of a massively distributed database.
Look, I'm just an armchair follower cheering on these projects. I can barely manage to write a query in SQL, or read through a C or Python or Java program. But I would argue two points here: (1) these languages may be too low-level and "non-formal" for writing and modeling and formally reasoning about and proving properties of mission-critical specifications - and (2) there seem to be some Big Data tools already deployed by institutions such as Google and Yale which support global petabyte-size databases on commodity boxes with nice properties such as near-real-time and ACID - and I sometimes worry that the "core devs" might be failing to review the literature (and reach out to fellow programmers) out there to see if there might be some formal program-verification and practical Big Data tools out there which could be applied to coming up with rock-solid, 100% consensus proposals to handle an issue such as blocksize scaling, which seems to have become much more intractable than many people might have expected.
I mean, the protocol solved the hard stuff: the elliptical-curve stuff and the Byzantine General stuff. How the heck can we be falling down on the comparatively "easier" stuff - like scaling the blocksize?
It just seems like defeatism to say "Well, the blockchain is already 20-30 GB and it's gonna be 20-30 TB ten years from now - and we need 10 Mbs bandwidth now and 10,000 Mbs bandwidth 20 years from - assuming the evil Verizon and AT&T actually give us that - so let's just become a settlement platform and give up on buying coffee or banking the unbanked or doing micropayments, and let's push all that stuff into some corporate-controlled vaporware without even a whitepaper yet."
So you've got Peter Todd doing some possibly brilliant theorizing and extrapolating on the idea of "treechains" - there is a Let's Talk Bitcoin podcast from about a year ago where he sketches the rough outlines of this idea out in a very inspiring, high-level way - although the specifics have yet to be hammered out. And we've got Blockstream also doing some hopeful hand-waving about the Lightning Network.
Things like Peter Todd's treechains - which may be similar to the spark in some devs' eyes called Lightning Network - are examples of the kind of algorithm or architecture which might manage to harness the massive computing power of miners and nodes in such a way that certain kinds of massive and graceful scaling become possible.
It just seems like a kindof tiny dev community working on this stuff.
Being a C or Python or Java programmer should not be a pre-req to being able to help contribute to the specification (and formal reasoning and program verification) for Bitcoin and the blockchain.
XML and UML are crap modeling and specification languages, and C and Java and Python are even worse (as specification languages - although as implementation languages, they are of course fine).
But there are serious modeling and specification languages out there, and they could be very helpful at times like this - where what we're dealing with is questions of modeling and specification (ie, "needs and requirements").
One just doesn't often see the practical, hands-on world of open-source github implementation-level programmers and the academic, theoretical world of specification-level programmers meeting very often. I wish there were some way to get these two worlds to collaborate on Bitcoin.
Maybe a good first step to reach out to the theoretical people would be to provide a modular executable algebraic specification of the Bitcoin protocol in a recognized, military/NASA-grade specification language such as Maude - because that's something the theoretical community can actually wrap their heads around, whereas it's very hard to get them to pay attention to something written only as a C / Python / Java implementation (without an accompanying specification in a formal language).
They can't check whether the program does what it's supposed to do - if you don't provide a formal mathematical definition of what the program is supposed to do.
Specification : Implementation :: Theorem : Proof
You have to remember: the theoretical community is very aware of the Curry-Howard isomorphism. Just like it would be hard to get a mathematician's attention by merely showing them a proof without telling also telling them what theorem the proof is proving - by the same token, it's hard to get the attention of a theoretical computer scientist by merely showing them an implementation without showing them the specification that it implements.
Bitcoin is currently confronted with a mathematical or "computer science" problem: how to secure the network while getting high enough transactional throughput, while staying within the limited RAM, bandwidth and hard drive space limitations of current and future infrastructure.
The problem only becomes a political and economic problem if we give up on trying to solve it as a mathematical and "theoretical computer science" problem.
There should be a plethora of whitepapers out now proposing algorithmic solutions to these scaling issues. Remember, all we have to do is apply the Byzantine General consensus-reaching procedure to a worldwide database which shuffles 2.1 quadrillion tokens among a few billion addresses. The 21 company has emphatically pointed out that racing to compute a hash to add a block is an "embarrassingly parallel" problem - very easy to decompose among cheap, fault-prone, commodity boxes, and recompose into an overall solution - along the lines of Google's highly successful MapReduce.
I guess what I'm really saying is (and I don't mean to be rude here), is that C and Python and Java programmers might not be the best qualified people to develop and formally prove the correctness of (note I do not say: "test", I say "formally prove the correctness of") these kinds of algorithms.
I really believe in the importance of getting the algorithms and architectures right - look at Google Search itself, it uses some pretty brilliant algorithms and architectures (eg, MapReduce, Paxos) which enable it to achieve amazing performance - on pretty crappy commodity hardware. And look at BitTorrent, which is truly p2p, where more demand leads to more supply.
So, in this vein, I will close this lengthy rant with an oddly specific link - which may or may not be able to make some interesting contributions to finding suitable algorithms, architectures and data structures which might help Bitcoin scale massively. I have no idea if this link could be helpful - but given the near-total lack of people from the Haskell and ML and functional worlds in these Bitcoin specification debates, I thought I'd be remiss if I didn't throw this out - just in case there might be something here which could help us channel the massive computing power of the Bitcoin network in such a way as to enable us simply sidestep this kind of desperate debate where both sides seem right because the other side seems wrong.
https://personal.cis.strath.ac.uk/neil.ghani/papers/ghani-calco07
The above paper is about "higher dimensional trees". It uses a bit of category theory (not a whole lot) and a bit of Haskell (again not a lot - just a simple data structure called a Rose tree, which has a wikipedia page) to develop a very expressive and efficient data structure which generalizes from lists to trees to higher dimensions.
I have no idea if this kind of data structure could be applicable to the current scaling mess we apparently are getting bogged down in - I don't have the game-theory skills to figure it out.
I just thought that since the blockchain is like a list, and since there are some tree-like structures which have been grafted on for efficiency (eg Merkle trees) and since many of the futuristic scaling proposals seem to also involve generalizing from list-like structures (eg, the blockchain) to tree-like structures (eg, side-chains and tree-chains)... well, who knows, there might be some nugget of algorithmic or architectural or data-structure inspiration there.
So... TL;DR:
(1) I'm freaked out that this blocksize debate has splintered the community so badly and dragged on so long, with no resolution in sight, and both sides seeming so right (because the other side seems so wrong).
(2) I think Bitcoin could gain immensely by using high-level formal, algebraic and co-algebraic program specification and verification languages (such as Maude including Maude-NPA, Mobile Maude parameterized skeletons, etc.) to specify (and possibly also, to some degree, verify) what Bitcoin does - before translating to low-level implementation languages such as C and Python and Java saying how Bitcoin does it. This would help to communicate and reason about programs with much more mathematical certitude - and possibly obviate the need for many political and economic tradeoffs which currently seem dismally inevitable - and possibly widen the collaboration on this project.
(3) I wonder if there are some Big Data approaches out there (eg, along the lines of Google's MapReduce and BigTable, or Yale's CalvinDB), which could be implemented to allow Bitcoin to scale massively and painlessly - and to satisfy all stakeholders, ranging from millionaires to micropayments, coffee drinkers to the great "unbanked".
submitted by BeYourOwnBank to Bitcoin [link] [comments]

Introducing CryptoCalc

EDIT: free version now out! Search the App Store for "CryptoCalcLite"
I am a 13 year old bitcoin enthusiast and today, I am launching my app, CryptoCalc.
CryptoCalc is a new iPhone and iPod Touch app with a simple, intuitive UI that lets you see the exchange rate fast, and lets you calculate and convert effortlessly in 23 world currencies. Searching “Bitcoin” on the app store, it is inundated with cluttered, complex apps. If one is just trying to price their merchandise for the day, do they really need to know current network hash rate or amount of blocks mined in the last 24 hours or trade volume? Bitcoin apps are so feature rich, that they are not friendly for quick reference! Some may need all that information, and there are better apps for those... but for those of us that just want quick and simple tickers and conversions, there is now an option.
It is CryptoCalc. It offers a simple, clean UI that is perfect for just knowing what you need to know: bitcoin's exchange rate. Converting to bitcoin is easy: just tap the field, and enter the amount in fiat currency. $25 in bitcoin? It is BTC 0.06872, not BTC 0.06872 and 142 blocks mined in 24 hours and 90836 transactions in past day and here's an incomprehensible chart and the hash rate is... No jumping through hoops, no complexity: just simplicity.
The app can be found at https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/cryptocalc/id919003873?ls=1&mt=8 or by searching “CryptoCalc” in the iOS app store.
I would appreciate any ideas, comments, or feedback as I'm working on the future of CryptoCalc, as well as future Bitcoin apps.
Thanks!
submitted by intergalacticrockets to Bitcoin [link] [comments]

Bitsoup - New Bitcoin News and Price Tracking App for iOS. Would love everyone's feedback!

Hey /bitcoin,
We just released Bitsoup to the App Store. A bitcoin news and price tracking app for iPhone and iPad. It aggregates bitcoin news from some of the top bitcoin sites including the /bitcoin sub-reddit! Includes high res charts and bitcoin price updated on the homescreen!
https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/bitsoup-real-time-bitcoin/id898815558?mt=8
Would love if everyone could check it out and let us know what you think. We want to make a great product that helps everyone stay up-to-date on everything bitcoin!
Thanks! -Bitsoup Team
submitted by bitsoupapp to Bitcoin [link] [comments]

[uncensored-r/Bitcoin] I've been working on a python program that forecasts bitcoin/alt coin prices based on historical ...

The following post by makhalifa is being replicated because some comments within the post(but not the post itself) have been silently removed.
The original post can be found(in censored form) at this link:
np.reddit.com/ Bitcoin/comments/7wz0gj
The original post's content was as follows:
Right now I am running the program on an AWS EC2 server and texting (MMS) the images to myself (graphs forecasted 1day/3day/1week/3week etc.) for different currencies.
It would be pretty simple to add new users who want a once per day text showing them the highest predicted alt currencies for the day and also the predicted Bitcoin charts for the coming weeks.
Basically I've spent a lot of time creating predictive models and have good resources for up-to-date data, just need to know what people like you would want to see in a website or service that would show you this information. I can create iPhone Apps/websites but want to find out what you find most useful before I go to far down a rabbit hole.
Here is an example (price spoiler alert) of a predictive BTC chart that I ran today.
Chart.
submitted by censorship_notifier to noncensored_bitcoin [link] [comments]

We developed a customizable market tracking app called BitFix and would love feedback.

We’ve put together the first version of a customizable app that tracks Bitcoin market data, and we’d love to get some feedback.
It came about because we’re a couple of expats who wanted to follow multiple bitcoin markets in one place, but we wanted to filter out data we don’t need.
It’s called BitFix, and it runs on iPhone (iOS 9+). BitFix lets you stack single-purpose info cards, which together become your own personalized view of Bitcoin price and performance data.
You can see news, current price data, and absolute and relative price charts over the last year. Right now, BitFix tracks USD, EUR, JPY and GBP from four exchanges. The next version will have more currencies and a new chart type.
We have a ton of ideas of where to go after that, but feedback from the community would help us figure out where to focus.
Check it out here.
submitted by gravitycollapse to Bitcoin [link] [comments]

[uncensored-r/Bitcoin] OMG CoinBase Mobile App Automatically Bought Bitcoin at Worst Time!

The following post by bionic_bi_tween is being replicated because the post has been silently removed.
The original post can be found(in censored form) at this link:
np.reddit.com/ Bitcoin/comments/7lf042
The original post's content was as follows:
Okay, “worst” is probably an exaggeration, and I’m somewhat at fault but I still really don’t know what the hell happened!
Around 5:30pm Pacific I saw Bitcoin prices going down. My verification at all the other exchanges have been pending for a week+ frustratingly, and I had no fiat in Coinbase/GDAX, so I bring up the Coinbase iPhone app just to see how much higher it was selling Bitcoin at compared to its own chart. For some stupid reason on my part, I punched in $250 USD and saw that I could buy around .016354 BTC at $15,164, which was about $150 higher than what the chart was showing.
I’m at work and get distracted by, you know, actual work, so I put my phone down with the screen still up and start using my computer. I’m not paying attention to the screen for at most a few minutes (my iPhone auto locks after 5m, so it had to be shorter than that), and I see out of the corner of my eye the screen redrawing like it’s loading something. I see it flash a message like “Congratulations! You just purchased...” and I pick up my phone like WTF?!?
Of course I can’t cancel, and I know, I’m just gonna HODL, but I didn’t necessarily want to give Coinbase more business (though my hands are tied if I want to buy the dip while waiting verification), and I was watching the prices go down and definitely would have waited a little longer to see it go down to $13.5k and then buy around then.
I know it’s already back up to $14.7k and could go back down or up again, but it’s the fact that I didn’t even execute the transaction that really gets me. I know some will doubt how it was even possible, but maybe it was a one in a million glitch. Has anyone else experienced this?
Anyway, please Gemini, Kraken, Bitstamp, hurry with your verification already!
submitted by censorship_notifier to noncensored_bitcoin [link] [comments]

12-22 04:22 - 'OMG CoinBase Mobile App Automatically Bought Bitcoin at Worst Time!' (self.Bitcoin) by /u/bionic_bi_tween removed from /r/Bitcoin within 0-10min

'''
Okay, “worst” is probably an exaggeration, and I’m somewhat at fault but I still really don’t know what the hell happened!
Around 5:30pm Pacific I saw Bitcoin prices going down. My verification at all the other exchanges have been pending for a week+ frustratingly, and I had no fiat in Coinbase/GDAX, so I bring up the Coinbase iPhone app just to see how much higher it was selling Bitcoin at compared to its own chart. For some stupid reason on my part, I punched in $250 USD and saw that I could buy around .016354 BTC at $15,164, which was about $150 higher than what the chart was showing.
I’m at work and get distracted by, you know, actual work, so I put my phone down with the screen still up and start using my computer. I’m not paying attention to the screen for at most a few minutes (my iPhone auto locks after 5m, so it had to be shorter than that), and I see out of the corner of my eye the screen redrawing like it’s loading something. I see it flash a message like “Congratulations! You just purchased...” and I pick up my phone like WTF?!?
Of course I can’t cancel, and I know, I’m just gonna HODL, but I didn’t necessarily want to give Coinbase more business (though my hands are tied if I want to buy the dip while waiting verification), and I was watching the prices go down and definitely would have waited a little longer to see it go down to $13.5k and then buy around then.
I know it’s already back up to $14.7k and could go back down or up again, but it’s the fact that I didn’t even execute the transaction that really gets me. I know some will doubt how it was even possible, but maybe it was a one in a million glitch. Has anyone else experienced this?
Anyway, please Gemini, Kraken, Bitstamp, hurry with your verification already!
'''
OMG CoinBase Mobile App Automatically Bought Bitcoin at Worst Time!
Go1dfish undelete link
unreddit undelete link
Author: bionic_bi_tween
submitted by removalbot to removalbot [link] [comments]

[uncensored-r/CryptoCurrency] A Full Analysis Of Eidoo (EDO) One Of The Most Undervalued Crypto Currencies In My Opinion

The following post by MetallicMike27 is being replicated because some comments within the post(but not the post itself) have been openly removed.
The original post can be found(in censored form) at this link:
np.reddit.com/ CryptoCurrency/comments/7bwgpe
The original post's content was as follows:
Before I start, please be aware this isn't some shill post, I'm just very passionate about this project and if you are just going to hate with no constructive criticism of the project then please leave. I am not asking you to buy the token and if you are going to please do your own research and come to your own conclusions.
So to start:
What is EIDOO?
A TL;DR Version: EIDOO aims to target several industries in the crypto currency world. First it wants to be a hybrid wallet available on your phone. You can store ERC-20 tokens and your Bitcoin on the wallet. Secondly it wants to build an ICO-Engine through the same app, the ICO-Engine will allow you to use your Ethereum or Bitcoin contained in your wallet to easily enter ICO's and retrieve the tokens. Imagine having MyEtherWallet on your phone, whilst also being able to enter ICOs directly on that same app. This ease of use in my opinoin will be amazing for new comers and people looking to get into crypto. Right now most platforms are not accesible or are too complex for the mainstream, but Eidoo solves that. Further along in their progress they are looking to get a Decentralized exchange built on the app, with a Digital identity function, this is later into 2018 so I won't go into too much detail, but to access those services you will have to be using the Eidoo token. A debit card is also available through the app and can be recharged easily on the app interface.
A Longer Version: The Eidoo Project is the first open, inclusive, global effort dedicated to the creation of an effective "blockchain-to-human interface", simplifying the interaction between users and blockchain-based assets, without sacrificing the main advantages that this technology can bring. Its output will be a set of products and services providing a new intuitive, easy, consistent and safe user experience, focused around a simple and secure way to store, buy, sell, transfer, and exchange blockchain-based digital assets, including all the major "cryptocurrencies" and "tokens", as well as buy or sell any goods paying in cryptocurrencies but without relying on any central authority.
The Eidoo Wallet will be the heart of the entire project. It will be natively multi-asset and designed for the mobile world: a single integrated environment that will be used to manage all tokens intuitively, without the need for complex configurations, but still leveraging the best security standards and best practices. Innovative services to exchange cryptocurrencies and tokens will be directly embedded in the platform. This integrated exchange system will never require the transfer of the assets to any centralized custodian third party that could cause financial losses due to bugs, hacks or exit scams: the user will always be in full control of his funds. In the long run, the Eidoo roadmap also includes a fully decentralized blockchain-based marketplace. Around these decentralized tools, additional services will be created in order to facilitate the use of cryptocurrencies, such as the ability to recharge a debit card directly from the Eidoo app without leaving the application.
For those who need it, Eidoo will also offer Digital Identity solutions, using designs such as the Web of Trust for pseudonymous sovereign identities as well as integrating digital identity cards.
Eidoo will be a value-added integrator that brings together proven technologies and established services that already exist, along with others that at this moment can only be imagined. The purpose of Eidoo is not just to do things that others do not, but to re-think things already accomplished through safer and simpler methods, keeping the focus on the user's experience and offering him the freedom to choose, while rendering the complexity of the "crypto world" easier to manage. We want to build a bridge towards worlds that at today are still far apart. Our attention is focused on offering to users a complete product, allowing them to manage complexity intuitively and safely.
The ambitious challenge of this project is also to give a common home and common goals to tech communities defending very different visions, leading to a healthy competition of approaches, methodologies, design philosophies. Trade-offs in blockchains space are difficult and complex: a simple "compromise" is often just a way to get the worst of the two worlds, while the best choice is sometimes to diversify the paths, to get to the same final objectives, under the same global user experience. This is also a risk management strategy: investing in a project that is not relying on a single paradigm, allows us to mitigate the exposure to technological risks, very high in an innovative industry full of financial and security implications. In a dynamic world, no good solutions stay that way if it doesn't evolve: as a methodological approach, Eidoo will continue to improve technological efficiency, security and user experience.
What is the use of the Eidoo token?
The Eidoo (EDO) token will be used to pay fees and for services inside the Eidoo app. Once fees are spent the tokens are split 50/50. 50% will be paid to the developer team, and 50% will be burnt. Coins will be consistently burnt until there are no more circulating tokens, in which case BTC and ETH can be used as a substitute for fees in the Eidoo app.
Why EIDOO over some similar projects such as OMG, PAY, MTL?
  • EIDOO currently has a working app on the appstore, you can use their Ethereum wallet to store all your ERC-20 tokens safely on your phone.
  • EIDOO makes it easy for the MAINSTREAM to adopt. This being one of the most important issues with crypto. It allows your everyday joe to easily start with cryptos.
  • EIDOO currently has 120K users on its app and has seen huge growth over the month of October, nearly 1200% growth in users.
  • EIDOO is currently infront and ahead of their promised roadmap. This is rare for most crypto currencies and most are behind.
Where can I find EIDOO tokens?
Currently they are listed on BitFinex, HITBTC and EtherDelta.
Can I use and test the EIDOO product right now?
Yes you can go to the Google appstore or iPhone app store and get the application. Test it out see what you think.
EIDOO links
Website: https://eidoo.io
Market Capilization: https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/eidoo/#charts
submitted by censorship_notifier to noncensored_bitcoin [link] [comments]

How to track your BTC and coin investments in one mobile app and stay up-to-date on News and Content!

Coin Markets Apps mission is to provide news related content around Bitcoin and other Digital Currencies for daily informative updates through your android phone.
We help everyone in the industry stay up-to-date on different coins / currencies / tokens through one mobile app. You can be NEW to the industry, or an early adopter - These resources are easily available to everyone in one location.
Resources include following:
Available on Android: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=coin.market.app.com&hl=en
iPhone Pending Release ETA: August 2017
We're accepting suggestions and links tweet @CoinMarketApps
If you like the app, please share and spread the word.
submitted by Champed to bitcoin_uncensored [link] [comments]

Subreddit Stats: ethereum top posts from 2015-07-30 to 2017-10-27 14:49 PDT

Period: 819.97 days
Submissions Comments
Total 1000 68061
Rate (per day) 1.22 82.97
Unique Redditors 563 11755
Combined Score 258924 352105

Top Submitters' Top Submissions

  1. 7610 points, 33 submissions: vbuterin
    1. Personal statement regarding the fork (536 points, 830 comments)
    2. Highlight for discussion: EIP 648 (make ethereum highly parallelizable within a single node; possible pre-sharding scalability improvement) (533 points, 100 comments)
    3. A Grab Bag of Thoughts on ETC and Forks (458 points, 273 comments)
    4. Analyzing Token Sale Models (429 points, 100 comments)
    5. A note on how the latest Casper PoC accomplishes its fast block times safely (417 points, 80 comments)
    6. A (not so sneak) peek at the current version of the Casper contract (313 points, 77 comments)
    7. The Current HF Status (309 points, 504 comments)
    8. Should we make a move toward making checksummed hex addresses mandatory? (296 points, 75 comments)
    9. How can Ethereum Research be more welcoming to newcomers and people from the outside with good ideas? (294 points, 115 comments)
    10. Sharding Research in Mind Map Form (265 points, 26 comments)
  2. 5672 points, 17 submissions: 5chdn
    1. Huge Milestone: Ethereum Stack Exchange graduates as one of the top-35 world technology sites. (903 points, 55 comments)
    2. Happy Byzantium hard-fork from the Parity offices! :) (793 points, 25 comments)
    3. Welcome to Ethereum, the Reddit front page of the Web 3, read this to get started or ask questions. (536 points, 321 comments)
    4. Ethereum's Byzantium Hard Fork Is Running Smoothly, Developers Say (507 points, 50 comments)
    5. [Ongoing Q&A Thread] Newbie Corner, ask your questions here. (351 points, 1968 comments)
    6. The Multi-sig Hack: A Postmortem (298 points, 206 comments)
    7. Parity 1.7.3 is released. If you run a Parity Ethereum node please upgrade before the Byzantium hard-fork kicks in at block 4_370_000. (288 points, 52 comments)
    8. Ladies and Gentlemen, we have forked. (274 points, 74 comments)
    9. Parity 1.7.2-beta released. Byzantium inside. (239 points, 21 comments)
    10. Parity 1.7.6 ... consensus-relevant fix ... for hard-fork ... please upgrade ... 4_370_000 ... ... (239 points, 56 comments)
  3. 5045 points, 21 submissions: Souptacular
    1. Why I Can't Defend Coindesk Any Longer. Take Action. Support Omar. (596 points, 117 comments)
    2. Byzantium HF Announcement - Ethereum Blog (368 points, 84 comments)
    3. Ethereum's ERC-20 token standard has been formalized as an EIP (364 points, 33 comments)
    4. ROPSTEN TESTNET USERS UPDATE YOUR CLIENTS. Hard fork is occurring in the next 48 hours. (360 points, 89 comments)
    5. Byzantium Fork Status - Monitor It Live! (305 points, 101 comments)
    6. [IMPORTANT] There are NO donation addresses for the White Hat Group currently. Anyone who is posting an address is scamming. (249 points, 20 comments)
    7. Help Wanted: Metropolis QA/Testing (238 points, 23 comments)
    8. Ethereum Core Dev Meeting and Metropolis Release Date (234 points, 57 comments)
    9. [URGENT] Update your clients to geth v1.7.2, Parity v1.7.6, or Harmony v.2.1.0 if you have not done so already! Less than 24 hours until the Byzantium hard fork. (230 points, 78 comments)
    10. [ANN] Update your geth client to 1.5.3. Consensus bug in geth v1.4.19 and v1.5.2 - Ethereum Blog (224 points, 65 comments)
  4. 4881 points, 13 submissions: insomniasexx
    1. What Happens When you Send a Transaction via MyEtherWallet (A Very Simple Illustration) (1307 points, 137 comments)
    2. [UPDATED] It’s Time to Get Real: Stop Relying on Third Parties to Protect You & Your Funds. You are responsible for your security. (888 points, 197 comments)
    3. Words are Hard: Defining Common Terms in the Ethereum / Crypto Space (665 points, 77 comments)
    4. MyEtherWallet v3.10.5 Released: The gas price can now be adjusted by 0.1 GWEI instead of 1 GWEI. This also means the min gas price via slider is 0.1 GWEI 🎉 (367 points, 39 comments)
    5. This is your friendly weekly reminder that this is crypto and you are ultimately responsible for your safety and security. Please be diligent. (232 points, 51 comments)
    6. ⚠ BEWARE: MYETHERWALLET >>.INFO<< IS A PHISHING SCAM AND WILL TAKE ALL YOUR FUNDS. myEtherWallet is MyEtherWallet.com (230 points, 30 comments)
    7. It’s Time to Get Real: Stop Relying on Third Parties to Protect You & Your Funds. You are responsible for your security. (212 points, 61 comments)
    8. Massive MyEtherWallet.com Update: Better URIs, The Hardfork, and looking back at the Golem Crowdfund. (177 points, 28 comments)
    9. Announcing MyEtherWallet v3.4: The Node Switcher (168 points, 48 comments)
    10. Pro-Tips: How Not to get Scammed during a Token Sale (167 points, 65 comments)
  5. 4567 points, 10 submissions: econoar
    1. Visa, IBM, Microsoft and USAA have all posted jobs in the past week looking for Ethereum developers (1217 points, 108 comments)
    2. Bank of America is looking for developers with a background in Ethereum to help build a new Card Account and real-time settlement system. (952 points, 105 comments)
    3. Goldman-Backed Startup Circle Launches No-Fee Foreign Payments Service. Built on Ethereum. (867 points, 96 comments)
    4. Santander Vies to Become First Bank to Issue Cash on Blockchain using Public Ethereum Chain (417 points, 82 comments)
    5. Ethereum isn't about price and hashrate, it's about making applications that could change the world. (332 points, 115 comments)
    6. geth fix is here (180 points, 38 comments)
    7. @avsa: Just tested @zsfelfoldi light client. Mainnet synced in 3m30s from scratch, used 30mb. Didn't need to change a single line of code in Mist. (163 points, 23 comments)
    8. Ethcore blog: "You should see fully hard-fork optional clients appearing in the next week or so" (154 points, 60 comments)
    9. Thomson Reuters is making their own Ethereum wallet (144 points, 33 comments)
    10. Nasdaq Veteran Joins Ethereum Foundation as Security Lead (141 points, 9 comments)
  6. 3988 points, 17 submissions: chriseth
    1. Ethereum testnet just verified a zcash transaction (729 points, 157 comments)
    2. Solidity version 0.4.16 released (431 points, 34 comments)
    3. Solidity v0.4.12 Released (285 points, 16 comments)
    4. Solidity 0.4.18 released (272 points, 20 comments)
    5. Solidity 0.4.15 released (263 points, 17 comments)
    6. Solidity v0.4.17 Released (211 points, 8 comments)
    7. New Blog post: An Update on Integrating Zcash on Ethereum (ZoE) (206 points, 88 comments)
    8. zkSNARKs and Smart Contracts on Plasma - Recordings of Ethereum Berlin October (201 points, 20 comments)
    9. Babbage - a mechanical smart contract language (190 points, 40 comments)
    10. Solidity Version 0.4.11 Released (184 points, 12 comments)
  7. 3693 points, 16 submissions: twigwam
    1. Understand why Ethereum exists, and you’ll get why it’s a big deal [MIT Technology Review] (539 points, 29 comments)
    2. Spotify acquires blockchain startup Mediachain to solve music’s attribution problem (420 points, 45 comments)
    3. The National Bank of Canada Just Joined An Alliance to Develop Ethereum [Motherboard] (300 points, 24 comments)
    4. Ethereum Stole the Show at Microsoft's New York City Demo Day (292 points, 9 comments)
    5. A secure internet voting system using Ethereum and Zero-Knowledge Proof (268 points, 103 comments)
    6. The UN Wants to Adopt Bitcoin And Ethereum, And Soon (258 points, 36 comments)
    7. The Birth of Enterprise Ethereum in 2017 (216 points, 37 comments)
    8. More Banks to Sign Up for ING's Ethereum Oil Trading Platform (181 points, 9 comments)
    9. Vinay Gupta - European Parliament blockchain presentation! (176 points, 25 comments)
    10. Ethereum, The Next Internet (158 points, 23 comments)
  8. 3571 points, 17 submissions: karalabe
    1. Geth v1.7.2 (Urgent Update) out! Yes, Byzantium hotfix. Please update ASAP! (yay fuzzer) (454 points, 87 comments)
    2. Geth v1.6.5 - Hat Trick (counters current attack) (308 points, 72 comments)
    3. Roses are red, Violets are blue, Geth now supports Hardware wallets too! (v1.5.9) (270 points, 53 comments)
    4. Geth 1.6.0 - Puppeth Master released! Our best work till now ;) (241 points, 73 comments)
    5. Geth 1.7 - Megara: Faster, slimmer, Byzantium enabled ;) (234 points, 103 comments)
    6. Never fear, Geth 1.6.3 - Covfefe is here! (227 points, 42 comments)
    7. Ethereum nodes plotted on Google Earth (224 points, 17 comments)
    8. Geth 1.4.8 "DAO Wars" Released (217 points, 185 comments)
    9. Security Alert - DoS Vulnerability in the Soft Fork (185 points, 254 comments)
    10. Geth v1.7.1 (Ptolemy) - Byzantium on mainnet and Rinkeby! (172 points, 51 comments)
  9. 3407 points, 19 submissions: nickjohnson
    1. A proof-of-concept of a better crowdsale contract (408 points, 132 comments)
    2. Announcing the Ethereum Name Service Relaunch Date! (275 points, 59 comments)
    3. Introducing BeerCoin (213 points, 131 comments)
    4. AMA: We are the ENS team. Ask us anything! (207 points, 293 comments)
    5. ENS launch officially postponed. We'll back off, improve testing & validation, write a postmortem, and relaunch when ready. (207 points, 41 comments)
    6. First beta release of the ENS manager app - manage your ENS (sub)domains easily! (196 points, 86 comments)
    7. A smart contract solving the "gas money" problem for gifting ERC20 tokens (169 points, 19 comments)
    8. Ethereum gets quantum computing support with new EVM opcode 'TERMINATE' (166 points, 43 comments)
    9. Hosting a DNS domain on Ethereum (153 points, 19 comments)
    10. 'thetoken.eth' now has subdomains for all major tokens (149 points, 75 comments)
  10. 3294 points, 15 submissions: thehighfiveghost
    1. CoinDesk: Ethereum Foundation Strikes Deal with Russian Development Bank (618 points, 163 comments)
    2. Critical update RE: DAO Vulnerability (248 points, 995 comments)
    3. Melonport: We’re very proud to announce our new v0.1.0 release of the Melon Portal! Feedback welcome! (247 points, 33 comments)
    4. The Devcon2 site is now live! (243 points, 60 comments)
    5. BREAKING NEWS: I hereby announce that I, Vitalik Buterin, am the founder of ethereum. (237 points, 53 comments)
    6. Announcement: Underhanded Solidity Coding Contest (215 points, 27 comments)
    7. Very happy to announce Devcon2 is now sold out! See you all in Shanghai! (201 points, 24 comments)
    8. New blog post from Ethereum's Vitalik Buterin: Hard Fork Completed (181 points, 59 comments)
    9. The Ethereum Foundation and Wanxiang Blockchain Labs announce a blockbuster event combining Devcon2 and the 2nd Global Blockchain Summit in Shanghai, September 19–24, 2016 (177 points, 31 comments)
    10. The Ethereum Foundation is very proud to announce Banco Santander’s Gold Sponsorship of Devcon2, Shanghai, 19th - 21st Sept (164 points, 30 comments)
  11. 3182 points, 11 submissions: IDCrypto
    1. Singaporean Dollar Tokenized Through Ethereum’s Blockchain by the Monetary Authority of Singapore (690 points, 84 comments)
    2. Omise Go, Vitalik meet with the Central Bank of Thailand together (466 points, 75 comments)
    3. Japan’s Telecom Giant Launches Smart Contracts Project, Joins Ethereum Enterprise Alliance (368 points, 16 comments)
    4. Porsche to use a private Ethereum based blockchain (283 points, 55 comments)
    5. Toyota Prototypes Ethereum Blockchain Based Car Sharing Uber Alternative (259 points, 27 comments)
    6. Ethereum Developers Are Building a Sharding Solution Using Python (229 points, 29 comments)
    7. Blockchain payments startup TenX joins the Enterprise Ethereum Alliance (221 points, 6 comments)
    8. Russian Politician Calls For Removal of Taxation on Bitcoin and Ethereum (200 points, 12 comments)
    9. Russian Airline Starts Using Ethereum’s Blockchain in Live Production (193 points, 7 comments)
    10. ConsenSys Launches Due Diligence for ICOs (147 points, 29 comments)
  12. 3083 points, 16 submissions: latetot
    1. Thomson Reuters to make financial data available on Ethereum (388 points, 31 comments)
    2. Ever wonder how people are using ETH right now? see top contracts by gas used today: ENS, Etherdelta, gambling, exchanges, tokens - Good times! (333 points, 54 comments)
    3. ETH broke 300,000 transactions today for the first time (271 points, 113 comments)
    4. Vitalik confirms Zero knowledge proofs are on ETH roadmap (206 points, 87 comments)
    5. Ethereum processed more transactions than Bitcoin yesterday (193 points, 19 comments)
    6. The ability to reverse exploits that violate the intent and good faith actions of thousands of people will promote mainstream adoption - not hinder it. (192 points, 545 comments)
    7. Ethereum Wallets and the Problem of the Default Gas Price (178 points, 36 comments)
    8. Brian Armstrong, Coinbase CEO, 'if Ethereum pulls off this hard fork, very positive signal...shows they can listen to community, execute in time of crisis' (173 points, 106 comments)
    9. Of all the ups and downs over last couple of years, today's news has worried me the least (173 points, 18 comments)
    10. Attacker is gearing up again for new spam deluge (154 points, 123 comments)
  13. 2603 points, 12 submissions: sandakersmann
    1. Vitalik Buterin on Twitter: "I am working 100% on ETH." (362 points, 127 comments)
    2. Ethereum Reaches 50% of Bitcoin's Transaction Volumes (351 points, 78 comments)
    3. Looks like the work on "Mastering Ethereum" has started :) (280 points, 95 comments)
    4. What is Ethereum, and could it actually replace Bitcoin? (251 points, 79 comments)
    5. Gavin Andresen on Twitter: "ETH has 80% of BTC volume and is scaling with little drama. BTC's scaling 'problem' is due to a few 'we know what's best' devs" (229 points, 90 comments)
    6. Ethereum now has more nodes than Bitcoin! (186 points, 25 comments)
    7. Marius Kjærstad on Twitter: "At this pace it won't be many days before #Ethereum facilitates more transactions than #Bitcoin" (174 points, 26 comments)
    8. Raiden Network IoT Demo. Enabling high speed asset transfers for Ethereum. (174 points, 24 comments)
    9. Ethereum is Now the Most Secure Public Blockchain, Overtaking Bitcoin (173 points, 5 comments)
    10. Go Fork Yourself: Ethereum Booming, Near Double Bitcoin's Transactions (143 points, 13 comments)
  14. 2175 points, 9 submissions: avsa
    1. Starter guide: (almost) all the links you'll need to start understanding ethereum. (431 points, 198 comments)
    2. Update on the White Hat attack (373 points, 262 comments)
    3. ELI5: Byzantium Changes (306 points, 54 comments)
    4. New website: more content, more tutorials, more explanations, more unicorns. It's a new dawn! (217 points, 66 comments)
    5. We are doing a white hat attack on the DAO. (195 points, 267 comments)
    6. Ethereum Name Service Bug Bounty is Live (191 points, 18 comments)
    7. Release 0.8: First Mist Beta is out! Also, Wallet update. (169 points, 87 comments)
    8. New Ethereum Wallet 0.7.5, the "I'm sorry for 0.7.4" version. (149 points, 53 comments)
    9. Wallet and Mist 0.8.2: Coinbase integration, replay protection, new Auth UI and more (144 points, 57 comments)
  15. 2119 points, 3 submissions: PhiStr90
    1. Enterprise Ethereum Alliance Becomes World’s Largest Open-source blockchain Initiative (1209 points, 77 comments)
    2. Ethereum is now for the first time the blockchain with highest mining incentive or simply put 'the most secured' (462 points, 126 comments)
    3. Hewlett Packard Enterprise and 47 Organizations Join 200-Member Strong Enterprise Ethereum Alliance (448 points, 42 comments)
  16. 2065 points, 7 submissions: andrewkeys
    1. FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: EEA adds 86 new members (552 points, 80 comments)
    2. Ethereum is Growing Exponentially in China (440 points, 46 comments)
    3. 10 weeks of Ethereum education, and if you pass the final, you have a chance to be employed at ConsenSys (284 points, 58 comments)
    4. FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Enterprise Ethereum Alliance is formed (256 points, 52 comments)
    5. EEA on Bloomberg (215 points, 9 comments)
    6. PRESS RELEASE: Ethereum Solidity now available in Microsoft Visual Studio (166 points, 24 comments)
    7. Check out new uport website (152 points, 40 comments)
  17. 1978 points, 9 submissions: cashitter
    1. SEC charges two ICO's with fraud (398 points, 105 comments)
    2. Ethereum Is Already Using a Small Country's Worth of Electricity (349 points, 107 comments)
    3. Martin Köppelmann (Founder of Gnosis): I am working 100% on ETH. (287 points, 11 comments)
    4. Right now there are 3 Ethereum related stories on the front page of HackerNews (194 points, 31 comments)
    5. switzerland (Home to the Ethereum Foundation) announced the official deregulation of blockchain startups (166 points, 14 comments)
    6. Apparent Agreement On Block 2,642,462 For The Next Hardfork. (162 points, 33 comments)
    7. [Video]Can Ethereum Restore Online Freedom and Transform the Internet? (144 points, 48 comments)
    8. Even Kuno Goda (Ethereum's very own artist) is working 100% on ETH (143 points, 0 comments)
    9. Real Vitalik got a message from Scam Vitalik (135 points, 7 comments)
  18. 1945 points, 4 submissions: jbaylina
    1. The WHG has Returned 100% of the Rescued Funds to their Rightful Owners (890 points, 78 comments)
    2. The WHG has Returned ~95% of the Funds and Now Hold Less Than $10 Million Worth of Rescued Funds. (644 points, 70 comments)
    3. A Modified Version of a Common Multisig Had A Vulnerability - The WHG Took Action & Will Return the Funds (284 points, 125 comments)
    4. Tonight the WHG will begin returning the rescued funds! (127 points, 23 comments)
  19. 1705 points, 4 submissions: AQuentson
    1. Ethereum Now Has Three Times More Nodes Than Bitcoin (704 points, 107 comments)
    2. Germany’s Energy Giant Launches 100s of Ethereum Based Electric Cars Charging Stations (468 points, 63 comments)
    3. Ethereum Developers Call on Miners to Use the Adaptive Gas Limit (374 points, 49 comments)
    4. Magic Internet Money is Finally a Reality – Web3.0 is Here (159 points, 44 comments)
  20. 1656 points, 1 submission: JcsPocket
    1. If this was you, thank you. (1656 points, 170 comments)
  21. 1625 points, 6 submissions: heliumcraft
    1. Plasma: Scalable Autonomous Smart Contracts (655 points, 129 comments)
    2. Vitalik Buterin: Casper PoC3 backbone simulations: 3s block time, 1.25s avg latency + 2s avg clock offset: 1% stale rate (284 points, 185 comments)
    3. Twitter: "You don't see these type of snarky comments from the Ethereum community when, say, a Bitcoin exchange gets hacked or a wallet has a bug.." (213 points, 141 comments)
    4. Iuri Matias (Embark Developer): "Embark, dev tools and dapps I work on will be targeting Ethereum as their primary platform. 100% ETH" (179 points, 2 comments)
    5. Vitalik Buterin on Twitter: Does anyone else notice how literally the only people calling for a hard fork or chain rollback right now are concern trolls? (161 points, 76 comments)
    6. twitter: "Amazon S3 currently making the case for the need of decentralized platforms such as ethereum's swarm" (133 points, 4 comments)
  22. 1527 points, 3 submissions: hodlon
    1. Mozilla offering $2M to anyone who can decentralize the web (812 points, 117 comments)
    2. Motherboard: Okay, WTF Is Ethereum? (515 points, 106 comments)
    3. "The Switchening" - When projects and business start switching over to Ethereum from other Blockchains. (200 points, 77 comments)
  23. 1503 points, 7 submissions: JoeyUrgz
    1. Introducing Bloom: The Future of Credit (372 points, 138 comments)
    2. Scaling Ethereum to Billions of Users (330 points, 61 comments)
    3. district0x Joins the Project Transparency Initiative (200 points, 19 comments)
    4. Will Work For Ethereum - Ethlance (175 points, 11 comments)
    5. Golem for macOS now live! (158 points, 31 comments)
    6. Introducing Dharma: A Protocol for Decentralized Peer-to-Peer Lending (142 points, 53 comments)
    7. Introducing the District Registry – district0x (126 points, 4 comments)

Top Commenters

  1. vbuterin (7804 points, 341 comments)
  2. nickjohnson (6252 points, 798 comments)
  3. 5chdn (2780 points, 464 comments)
  4. Souptacular (2584 points, 215 comments)
  5. avsa (2370 points, 214 comments)
  6. insomniasexx (2190 points, 206 comments)
  7. FaceDeer (2026 points, 348 comments)
  8. aribolab (1987 points, 260 comments)
  9. latetot (1902 points, 337 comments)
  10. Huynh_B (1869 points, 10 comments)
  11. ItsAConspiracy (1676 points, 269 comments)
  12. karalabe (1580 points, 159 comments)
  13. Savage_X (1541 points, 163 comments)
  14. cyounessi (1500 points, 163 comments)
  15. huntingisland (1421 points, 340 comments)
  16. thehighfiveghost (1418 points, 96 comments)
  17. chriseth (1378 points, 117 comments)
  18. Mr_Yukon_C (1373 points, 167 comments)
  19. antiprosynthesis (1339 points, 458 comments)
  20. LarsPensjo (1305 points, 322 comments)
  21. NewToETH (1295 points, 117 comments)
  22. BullBearBabyWhale (1229 points, 103 comments)
  23. Dunning_Krugerrands (1220 points, 141 comments)
  24. aminok (1212 points, 244 comments)
  25. evoorhees (1184 points, 68 comments)
  26. dillon-nyc (1182 points, 54 comments)
  27. djrtwo (1161 points, 68 comments)
  28. mcgravier (990 points, 157 comments)
  29. DeviateFish_ (985 points, 655 comments)
  30. seweso (952 points, 138 comments)
  31. baddogesgotoheaven (896 points, 143 comments)
  32. WhySoS3rious (886 points, 124 comments)
  33. C1aranMurray (871 points, 191 comments)
  34. ethereum_alex (850 points, 65 comments)
  35. silkblueberry (849 points, 107 comments)
  36. newretro (834 points, 182 comments)
  37. mattdf (832 points, 38 comments)
  38. cryptoboy4001 (825 points, 85 comments)
  39. bobsummerwill (824 points, 97 comments)
  40. SrPeixinho (781 points, 86 comments)
  41. shakedog (768 points, 128 comments)
  42. textrapperr (763 points, 97 comments)
  43. greggdourgarian (757 points, 72 comments)
  44. edmundedgar (751 points, 93 comments)
  45. supr3m (741 points, 43 comments)
  46. LGuappo (724 points, 127 comments)
  47. PrototypeModel (724 points, 103 comments)
  48. Uptrenda (723 points, 68 comments)
  49. aakilfernandes (720 points, 72 comments)
  50. Sunny_McJoyride (691 points, 172 comments)

Top Submissions

  1. If this was you, thank you. by JcsPocket (1656 points, 170 comments)
  2. SmartBillions lottery contract just got hacked! by supr3m (1328 points, 301 comments)
  3. What Happens When you Send a Transaction via MyEtherWallet (A Very Simple Illustration) by insomniasexx (1307 points, 137 comments)
  4. Visa, IBM, Microsoft and USAA have all posted jobs in the past week looking for Ethereum developers by econoar (1217 points, 108 comments)
  5. Enterprise Ethereum Alliance Becomes World’s Largest Open-source blockchain Initiative by PhiStr90 (1209 points, 77 comments)
  6. Local Gym in Cincinnati by flufylobster1 (1159 points, 114 comments)
  7. "If bitcoin is a pocketcalculator ethereum is a brand new iphone" - Germanys second biggest Newspaper on bitcoin by postkasten (1050 points, 99 comments)
  8. Vitalik Buterin: 90% of token startups will fall by fanatseal (1043 points, 214 comments)
  9. Just received this from my 86 yr old Nanna - adoption is coming! by canya-io (1038 points, 71 comments)
  10. Everytime I try explaining Ethereum to skeptics by lafoie (996 points, 170 comments)

Top Comments

  1. 1653 points: Huynh_B's comment in If this was you, thank you.
  2. 498 points: supr3m's comment in SmartBillions lottery contract just got hacked!
  3. 469 points: kezekia's comment in I just sent my dad some Ethereum for Father's Day!
  4. 461 points: JackAceHole's comment in A made-in-Canada cryptocurrency called ethereum will soon be worth more than bitcoin
  5. 396 points: pembull's comment in What do you think is the biggest risk to the success of Ethereum? If we imagine Ethereum were to fail, how/why do you think it would fail?
  6. 387 points: apoefjmqdsfls's comment in Critical update RE: DAO Vulnerability
  7. 387 points: vbuterin's comment in A made-in-Canada cryptocurrency called ethereum will soon be worth more than bitcoin
  8. 379 points: totodile_lvl_7's comment in Vitalik Buterin: 90% of token startups will fall
  9. 364 points: GBG-glenn's comment in Ethereum Metropolis appears in late September
  10. 334 points: DamosDaze's comment in Introduced Ethereum to my Company
Generated with BBoe's Subreddit Stats (Donate)
submitted by subreddit_stats to subreddit_stats [link] [comments]

Charts & Co: Apple, Dow und Bitcoin im Check  Börse Stuttgart Best Apps for Buying Cryptocurrency In 2020 - YouTube Using Bitcoin on an iPhone - Blockchain HTML Wallet - YouTube Mine Bitcoin using iPhone #Benjamin(1) ✅ How To Access Cash App Bitcoin Charts

Live bitcoin price with bitcoin history, bitcoin chart and bitcoin graph that allows to analyze the latest btc price and bitcoin trend. Switch to more than 1600 Download Bitcoin Price , Rate & Chart. and enjoy it on your iPhone, iPad, and iPod touch. ‎Essential monitor App with the chart and rates of Bitcoin. Follow the rate and chart history of Bitcoin to the most important currencies of the world( US Dollar, Sterling Pound and Chinese Yuan). How To Add the Bitcoin Price to Your iPhone’s Notification Center. by newsbtc. 6 years ago. in Cryptocurrency news. Reading Time: 2min read It sure seems like Apple is getting friendlier toward bitcoin, doesn’t it? Following the company’s recent keynote in San Francisco, California, updated App Store rules were released that permitted bitcoin and other digital currency apps in the App ... Best iPhone and iPad Bitcoin Wallets in 2020 #1. Blockchain . With more than 17 million users, Blockchain is one of the most popular bitcoin wallet apps for iOS. It allows you to store your funds securely and easily send and receive bitcoin with anyone. There is a security center to ensure your funds have the essential protection from unauthorized access. The two-factor authentication offers ... BITCOIN TICKER PRO SUBSCRIPTION Support our app and subscribe to Bitcoin Ticker Pro for $4.99 a month. You remove all ads and get extra features like candle stick charts, order debt, show live trades and ability to show the bitcoin price on the icon badge. Payments will be charged to your iTunes Account at confirmation of purchase.

[index] [26537] [21737] [38846] [17003] [46141] [36184] [16899] [25196] [24198] [26802]

Charts & Co: Apple, Dow und Bitcoin im Check Börse Stuttgart

Check out Storyblocks here: http://storyblocks.com/MikeBilligTech_1217 — Bitcoin is a great way to get started in cryptocurrency investments. Check out Coinb... How To Access Cash App Bitcoin Charts __ Try Cash App using my code and we’ll each get $5! SFGQXGB https://cash.me/$AnthonyCashHere __ Price Check: https://a... New Affiliate code: Use “CVWR3LKU” and immediately get 20,000 satoshi sent right to the app. https://use.foldapp.com/r/CVWR3LKU 🔴Yes! This is the 4 minute ve... Top 5 Bitcoin Apps For Iphones http://wealthbuilderzsystem.com http://jointheclub.thewealthbuilderz.com The blog version https://thewealthbuilderz.com/top-5-... Crypto Course: https://geni.us/ovIL Coinbase Free $10 In Crypto: https://geni.us/8vPU Coinbase Link: https://geni.us/Mnd4a Coinbase Written Review: https://g...

#